Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

What we are witnessing now is unprecedented. Where were the disgruntled generals during the Clinton administration? How were they covered by the MSM?

@@@@@

The Prime question before all others!
A) they respected the Office of the Presidency enough not to speak out, and/or
B) they retired if they could not stomach the "regime."

Also, the MSM would not have given them space, except to trash them for violating (A).


388 posted on 04/16/2006 10:04:50 AM PDT by maica (You are being lied to. By elements in the media determined that Iraq must fail. - Ralph Peters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]


To: maica

Actually one American Commander of NATO made disparaging remarks about Clinton and got canned for it.


395 posted on 04/16/2006 10:10:54 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party. For those who value slogans over solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

To: maica; ALOHA RONNIE

I seem to recall a block of military resignations during the clinton time. They did it enmasse as the only way to legally express their disgust. The media didn't report it, and if it got any mention by-the-by, they were all dismissed as 'disgruntled.'

Ronnie, I'm thinking you might remember this, or could guess show would remember it. :-)

Pinz


434 posted on 04/16/2006 10:49:42 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson