Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2006 3:02:51 PM PDT by twippo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: twippo

"A well-known, local Christian pastor is denouncing a controversial new Bible curriculum designed for public schools which he says encourages students to question whether the Bible is the inspired Word of God."

I support the right of school districts to have elective Bible classes.

But if they do, it can't be religious and so the class will of course question the bible.

That's one reason I'm not enthused about forcing non-Christians to teach bible in public schools.


2 posted on 04/15/2006 3:14:50 PM PDT by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo

The only solution is anarchism + christian self governance.


3 posted on 04/15/2006 3:14:59 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo

bump


4 posted on 04/15/2006 3:15:52 PM PDT by twippo (Ted's of Beverly Hills: We want to put our meat in your mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo

It is not surprising in our current cultural environment that a textbook designed for public schools essentially ignores historical-critical problems. However, these could easily have been incorporated within the attribution approach with statements such as, "Many biblical scholars believe..." Moreover, it is not just historical criticism that is absent; synchronic methods and conclusions receive no real attention either, despite several references to the work of Robert Alter, who is also listed as a consultant. None of the actual authors or "content contributors" — Joanne McPortland, Marjorie Haney Schafer, Ph.D., Marc Stern, J.D., and Eve Tushnet — is listed in the SBL directory or appears to be a biblical scholar by profession. On one level, the absence is astonishing. The project as a whole might be likened to a high school textbook on, say, government, in which no recognition is given to the fields or methods of political science or history, and treatment of issues proceeds by attribution: "conservative Republicans say," "moderate Democrats hold, etc."

Since that time, I have looked more deeply into this project.

There used to be a running joke in response to Falwell's Moral Majority that ran "The moral majority is neither.' Well, the same could be said of the Bible Literacy Project: it is neither Biblical nor literary, and whatever it is about, it is certainly not Bible Literacy.


8 posted on 04/15/2006 3:21:42 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo

High school and undergrad students questioning and discussing the Bible, history and what not out of position of sheer ignorance is a very 20th century American idea of education, which has lead to many of the cultural and knowledge crises we are experiencing today. We really have a dumbed down populace.


14 posted on 04/15/2006 3:29:45 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo
If you want to teach the Bible in school you have to respect everyone who takes the class. Protestants, Catholics, Jews, agnostics, and atheists will be represented along with the occasional Muslim. You can teach that many people believe the Bible is the inspired word of God, but you cannot teach that the Bible is the inspired word of God. That is a matter of faith, not fact – and has no place in public education. Christianity is a very important part of our history and culture and should be a part of school curriculum.

Of course it’s a minefield. How can you teach such a controversial topic without upsetting students every day? How do you deal with the multitude of private interests who see an opportunity to indoctrinate your children? I’d like to see the curriculum. Anyone have a link?

23 posted on 04/15/2006 3:53:17 PM PDT by Gerfang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo
They are just "teaching the controversy".

:)

25 posted on 04/15/2006 3:55:49 PM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo
Rather than read about the Bible, if we'd all just read the Bible, we'd all be a lot better off.

We depend upon teachers too much, instead of THE Teacher.

John 14:26 says,
"But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you."

I've learned much more by reading THE WORD, than by reading about it.

Happy Resurrection Day!

37 posted on 04/15/2006 5:14:30 PM PDT by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twippo

How about ending "public" education?


39 posted on 04/15/2006 9:21:08 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson