Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officers in Call to Legalise Use of Drugs
Edinburgh Evening News (UK) ^ | 14 Apr 2006

Posted on 04/15/2006 2:21:22 PM PDT by Know your rights

SCOTTISH police officers have sparked anger after calling for the legalisation of all drugs - including heroin and cocaine.

The Strathclyde Police Federation has called for a dramatic change of direction in the battle on drugs crime, and the issue will be debated later this month.

The body, which represents 7000 officers, is set to argue that all drugs should be licensed in the same way as cigarettes and alcohol. Officers claim this would cut drug deaths and divert police resources to other crime-fighting priorities. It is the first time that an organisation representing officers has made such a demand.

Opponents today said the move would only increase the availability of drugs. But the federation believes millions of pounds are wasted on enforcing existing laws, with little impact on the availability of drugs on the street.

Inspector Jim Duffy, chairman of the federation, said: "We are not winning the war against drugs and we need to think about different ways to tackle it."

The Scottish Executive said that drug legislation is reserved to Westminster.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: corruption; dirtycops; drugskilledbelushi; himrleroy; lawenforcement; leo; leroyknowshisrights; mrleroy; mrleroyiskyr; thatsmrleroytoyou; wod; woddiecrushonleroy; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 next last
To: muawiyah
muawiyah:

By the way, down at the bottom, next to "Post reply | Privte reply | " you will find a number. That number refers to the post to which you are responding.

After posting to juvenile personalities at FR since early '98, I've found it wise to keep discussions in context.

It is a simple matter to rotate backwards through a FreeRepublic thread to find out what else the Freeper had to say.

Yes, it is. -- But some here try to divert discussions, when they find they can't debate the issue using logic.

You don't have to use that "copy all of it over" nonsense that you find in the inferior threads carved out for the use of children.

I find it useful when debating at certain lower levels.

The number-trace feature has been added long after 1998.

So what?

Your refusal to accept the future, and change, is not a good sign.

There you go making a inane, out of context comment, which proves the point made above.

Also quite evident is the fact that you've dropped your defense of unconstitutional prohibitions. -- Smart fella. -- You aren't very good at it. You're much better at half witty zingers.

201 posted on 04/20/2006 6:49:36 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
You and your doper buddies are the only ones concerned with the Constitution. The rest of us are concerned with the harm you do to society.

We can amend the Constitution if we need to, but if you destroy our world, there's not a damned thing we can do about it.

Think of the Drug War as a necessary prophylaxis designed to make you unhappy.

It does seem to be working.

Oh, yeah, and that paranoia you'all exhibit when someone questions the future of dope availability ~ it's a regular laugh riot.

202 posted on 04/20/2006 12:05:19 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Your refusal to accept the future, and change, is not a good sign.

There you go making a inane, out of context comment, which proves the point made above.

Also quite evident is the fact that you've dropped your defense of unconstitutional prohibitions. -- Smart fella. -- You aren't very good at it. You're much better at half witty zingers.

You and your doper buddies

I have no 'doper buddies'. That's just another half wit zinger.

are the only ones concerned with the Constitution.

Millions of normal people are concerned with what you prohibition warriors do.

The rest of us are concerned with the harm you do to society.

You use that 'society' bit to justify ignoring our Constitution.

We can amend the Constitution if we need to,

You think you can 'amend away' freedom? Dream on.

but if you destroy our world, there's not a damned thing we can do about it. Think of the Drug War as a necessary prophylaxis designed to make you unhappy. It does seem to be working.

Wrong. -- I'm quite happy to be defending our Constitution from prohibitionists like you.

Oh, yeah, and that paranoia you'all exhibit when someone questions the future of dope availability ~ it's a regular laugh riot.

Weird comment.. - I've seen no such "paranoia". Where did you?

203 posted on 04/20/2006 12:30:10 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Looks like you are reduced to name-calling ~ well, let's say, as usual you are reduced to name-calling.


204 posted on 04/20/2006 12:31:16 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You've been 'name calling' this entire thread. Get real.


205 posted on 04/20/2006 12:34:59 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Drugs should be made legal and illegal aliens made felons.

Since that logical course of action would completely dry up the flow of cartel bribe money to DC, it will never happen.

206 posted on 04/20/2006 12:36:48 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
There's important stuff going on in this world and you are still wanting to talk about dope.

Were you aware the Chi-coms have actually been posting on FR threads today about the Hu kow-tow event ~ several have been banned, but they'll be back.

Ever wonder why the Chi-coms fear us enough to bother commenting here?

207 posted on 04/20/2006 12:45:23 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There's important stuff going on in this world and you are still wanting to talk about dope.

Another bizarre 'jump shift' in our discussion. You're the one here obsessed with prohibitions on "dopers", not me. -- I want such prohibitions/infringements stopped, that's all.

Were you aware the Chi-coms have actually been posting on FR threads today about the Hu kow-tow event ~ several have been banned, but they'll be back. Ever wonder why the Chi-coms fear us enough to bother commenting here?

?? -- Are you trying to infer that I should listen to your comments on that subject? -- Why?

208 posted on 04/20/2006 1:11:38 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Because, it's obvious, you need your mind opened.


209 posted on 04/20/2006 1:21:24 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I'm sure we all have much to learn from someone with ideas as brilliant as the "Richard Pryor pot".


210 posted on 04/20/2006 3:18:13 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
If you know how to use google.com

Sorry, I'm not doing your homework for you ... it's YOUR claim so YOU can Google for the proof.

211 posted on 04/21/2006 3:07:29 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

You're just afraid to read stuff by noted historians of the Mafia.


212 posted on 04/21/2006 3:25:46 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"effective" is not a binary, yes-or-no condition.

This is what makes you king of the weasels.

Yes, using words according to their standard meaning is so underhanded.

213 posted on 04/21/2006 3:41:10 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: verity
Same old tired argument.

Same old tired WODdie evasion.

214 posted on 04/21/2006 3:42:44 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You're just afraid to read stuff by noted historians of the Mafia.

False ... when you meet your burden of proof and supply the specific text that supports your claim I'll be delighted to read it. Or you could just continue to blow hot air; your call.

215 posted on 04/21/2006 3:44:44 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
The point you are pushing ~ to wit, that the Mafia hasn't peddled booze since the elimination of Prohibition ~ is nonsense.

What you have is akin to a religious belief, albeit one in a cult.

216 posted on 04/21/2006 3:47:53 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The "my right to property" argument as the sole reason for anything went down the tubes with the Civil War.

Persons can't be property ... marijuana can. Or are you claiming that criminalization of marijuana is to protect the rights of the marijuana?

217 posted on 04/21/2006 3:49:01 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

Too early to be toking up eh!


218 posted on 04/21/2006 3:50:29 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The point you are pushing ~ to wit, that the Mafia hasn't peddled booze since the elimination of Prohibition

Stop lying about my position. What I've said is that YOUR claim that the alcohol black market is "thriving" is dubious and unproven. (Free clue: "thriving" means considerably more than just "existing.")

Will you ever support your claim?

219 posted on 04/22/2006 9:17:14 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Persons can't be property ... marijuana can. Or are you claiming that criminalization of marijuana is to protect the rights of the marijuana?

Too early to be toking up eh!

Not too early for you to be diving headfirst into the gutter, I see.

220 posted on 04/22/2006 9:18:44 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson