Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucky Dog; Dimensio; js1138; All
Are you contending that the fitter individuals don't more frequently survive and pass their genes to the next generation?

I have made no such statements. However, some others (advocates of evolution on this thread, I assume) have done so, at least indirectly. To wit: … Species evolve regardless of selection pressure…

Please don't quote me out of context again. That comment of mine was in response to a specific question of yours, not a general statement that natural selection isn't an important driver of speciation.

I am starting to understand the outrage that scientists feel when they are the victim of quote-mining. In future, Lucky Dog, please re-quote your complete question to me, and my complete response, or don't quote me at all. I've never had to ask anybody that before. Usually I am happy for bits and pieces of my words to be used in ongoing threads, but my views have never been so outrageously misrepresented before.

691 posted on 04/18/2006 9:25:08 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Miraculous explanations are just spasmodic omphalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry

Ping to 691.


693 posted on 04/18/2006 9:37:57 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Miraculous explanations are just spasmodic omphalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Thatcherite
Thatcherite, Please accept my apologies.

From post 689:

From Lucky Dog: The implication of your statement is that species come into existence purely randomly. Is this what you meant to imply?

From Thatcherite: No. That isn't what I meant to imply, and it isn't the implication of my statement. For a more accurate reflection try bracketing the word species with "some" and "occasionally" and you'll be closer to the mark. I never said that genetic drift of separated populations was the only driver of speciation. Why on earth would you draw that conclusion?

As note not in the post cited above: Lucky Dog never said that all species come into existence in said manner. There was no such conclusion drawn.

The apparently offending portion of post 626 restated:

From Patrick Henry: Are you contending that the fitter individuals don't more frequently survive and pass their genes to the next generation?

From Lucky Dog: I have made no such statements. However, some others (advocates of evolution on this thread, I assume) have done so, at least indirectly. To wit: [Some] …Species [occasionally] evolve regardless of selection pressure…

I trust that this has restatement has removed the cause of your offense.
699 posted on 04/18/2006 12:29:34 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson