[Lucky Dog]

You seem unaware that your lines of discussion have been examined by thousands of researchers over a couple hundred years.

I cannot claim to have read “thousands” of explanations. However, I have read more than a small number. Unfortunately, I have not found those to satisfactorily address my questions. It would be a tremendous favor if, perhaps, you could briefly summarize the principles (details are not necessary) of those specific to my points. Thanks.

[js1138]

No one will ever explain things to your satisfaction.

[js1138]

I cannot claim to have read “thousands” of explanations. However, I have read more than a small number.

Your questions indicate an unfamiliarity with the territory. You seem surprised by so many things that were argued to death many decades ago.

The fact that they were argued to death does not "prove" that the arguments are settled, but you are not breaking any new ground with your version of the arguments.