Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fr_freak
So, the end result is that I cannot so a person believing both in God and evolution without engaging in a logical disconnect.

Your problem is not in assuming the abilities of God, but in assuming the motives. As you are not a God, you have no means by which to assume that a God would have a specific motive to create a system wherein evolution would or would not occur.

In other words, it is fallacious to assume that a premise is false because a deity would not want it to be true. Such a conclusion assumes absolute knowledge of the mind of the deity, and that is impossible.
167 posted on 04/15/2006 2:39:17 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


Placemarker


170 posted on 04/15/2006 2:40:58 PM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
Your problem is not in assuming the abilities of God, but in assuming the motives. As you are not a God, you have no means by which to assume that a God would have a specific motive to create a system wherein evolution would or would not occur.

Actually, that is pretty much my point - that no one of us could know the motives of God, and therefore, since we accept His ability to make things happen at will, we cannot predict that He would do so according to a set of rules that we believe we can discover and understand. Establishing a theory of evolution is exactly that: an attempt by us to determine the rules by which God abides in His creation of species.
190 posted on 04/15/2006 3:10:50 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson