Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff

Bush cannot afford to fire Rumsfeld. Nor will Rumsfeld resign.

I'm not sure what the generals are trying to achieve. It could be to let the public know that a lot of senior military on active duty despise Rumsfeld and do not trust his judgment.

It could also just be disgust venting.

Rumsfeld at this point is already a lame duck SecDef. Congress doesn't respect his opinions enough to care about what he says on acquisition. The brass are digging in their heels to slow any changes he wants to make until after he leaves. He's already lost the fight to 'transform' the military - look at the QDR.

Rumsfeld was good for the military during his first 3 years or so - there was a lot of shaking up to do. However, he's outlived his usefulness. Unfortunately, he doesn't realize that.


40 posted on 04/15/2006 8:35:59 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Good morning.
"I'm not sure what the generals are trying to achieve.

They are choosing sides, hoping the DemocRATs will win. The fact that they harm the nation is less important than validating the RAT agenda that they bought into while being groomed by the clinton posse. Not many flag grade officers did, but that seems to be irrelevant to some.

Michael Frazier
142 posted on 04/15/2006 9:46:07 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson