Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ModelBreaker
I agree that the stakes are high. I doubt if this will go on until 2008. If we wait that long it will be too late (if it is not already).
I'm betting that either they have a very large chemical weapon stockpile, or one of our new "friends" like China or Russia has already sold them a couple of nukes.
Iran is not that big of a dog, It is hard for me to imagine them running this serious of a bluff.
Now, what they have may not be what they THINK they have, but I suspect that something is up.
Just my observations - Cordially,

GE
57 posted on 04/15/2006 9:23:22 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: GrandEagle
I agree that the stakes are high. I doubt if this will go on until 2008. If we wait that long it will be too late (if it is not already).

I agree. 2008 is too late. And Iran and our dems are working hard to make that happen. Fortunately, I think we have a president who would be willing to go to 10% approval rating if he thought it necessary to defend the country.

If I'm wrong in my assesment of W, and if a dem is elected in 2008, it's gonna look a lot like Armageddon. The 21st century is not going to be a nice time to be alive.

70 posted on 04/15/2006 9:45:57 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson