Replies

That documentary just blew this whole [cue the On Step Beyond music] "Alien Crop Circle" thinga-mahoozy right out of the water.

Only for the uninformed and not all that perceptive or discerning. The program was full of holes.

Linda Moulton Howe's book is much more extensive in the scientific analysis. She's a quality researcher and reporter.

1. The scientifically verified distinctions between hoaxed vs authentic crop circles are numerous.

2. There's not enough hoaxers and time for them to make all the crop circles--especially the larger more precise and complex ones.

3. The program deliberately held 'the experts' out who were the flakier sort.

4. Essentially, the program used a number of tried and true disniformation strategies to trash the topic. Clearly it worked.

You're kidding, right? No one on a website full of intelligent people actually believes this, do they? Some form of alien intelligence visits earth and leaves no signs of their appearance other than smashing some unfortunate farmer's corn?

People use rope and simple surveying tools available for hundred years, they cause lots of damage to some guy's crops, and that's it. End of story.

If you honestly disagree, why don't you describe what the holes in the program were? What holes are there in:

1) Getting some guys to make a human-made crop circle
2) Bringing in the fake alien researchers and demonstrating that they know nothing by having them fail to analyze the crop circle