[furquhart]

We need to strike Iran.

And to do so with nuclear arms.

After all, we're probably going to need nukes to take out some of those deep bunkers.

In terms of public reaction, I don't think there's much difference between using five nukes and fifty - especially if we did it quickly.

Use the nukes to hit Iranian WMD sites, missile sites, air bases, and any army units in the field. I imagine the results of hitting an Iranian infantry division out in the open, with, say, a 60KT warhead would be fairly smile-worthy.

[jerryem]

having been there several times ( the last time Sept. 05 ) and I have said this before, it would be a waste of "good points " to use force, the whole country is for sale, if its not tied down it has already been stolen, for a little money you can get the keys to anything and a little more money you can get all the Iranian help you need to do a self destruct. Yep, the little man is squealing, but that is typical for the Iranians they just love to paint themselves into a corner

[Grzegorz 246]

"I imagine the results of hitting an Iranian infantry division out in the open, with, say, a 60KT warhead would be fairly smile-worthy."

Would radioactive clouds over Iraq be smile-worthy too ?

[unixfox]

We need to strike Iran.

We could end it all right now with just one bullet strategically shot between the eyes of this tinhorn dictator.