Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: burzum
But I am more suprised that NASA would put an article like this on their website. Sure, they discuss all the advantages to using a 'magic' energy source, but they seem to have left out some minor details. How do you confine these anti-matter particles in large numbers and how do you create them economically. Reading the article, it would seem like it this a minor issue.

Oh, but it is! All you need to do is budget tons of money to keep throwing at it year after year, decade after decade, building up a huge research enterprise that just keeps on growing like Topsy. Of course, you'll need to periodically release pep talk white papers explaining how you're really making progress, and expect a "breakthrough" any year now.

23 posted on 04/15/2006 1:31:21 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Don Joe
PS:

Oh, but it is! All you need to do is budget tons of money to keep throwing at it year after year, decade after decade, building up a huge research enterprise that just keeps on growing like Topsy. Of course, you'll need to periodically release pep talk white papers explaining how you're really making progress, and expect a "breakthrough" any year now.

The beauty part of this scam is that after you've managed to drag it out for a few years, you can scream bloody murder about how "irresponsible" it would be to "throw away all the years of investment in this technology" any time Congress makes noise about pulling the plug on the program.

24 posted on 04/15/2006 1:37:02 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson