To: cajun-jack
Since Klayman has never won a case and neither has Judicial Watch...why don't they just have a duel...they will both lose in court!!! Man, do I remember how Klayman was Sleeping Beauty to the FR crowd in 1998. He was filing lawsuits against Clinton left and right, and that nutbag judge, Royce Lamberth, was playing along. The bandwidth was burning here, as hearty souls were putting down big coin with their bookies that Big Lar was going to bring Big Bill down!
Turns out it was all a dance for dollars and Lar turned into a pumpkin. I got solicitations from Klayman to the tune of two a week, sometimes. And he wrote books, describing in minute detail, the nefarious dealings of Clinton and his inevitable downfall at the hands of Sheriff Klayman.
If anything reinforced my cynicism about the do-gooders on the right who need just one dollar more so that justice will triumph it was Klayman and his money pit at JW.
I'm surprised he sleeps in the same place two nights in a row after all the benjamins he's scammed off of well-meaning conservatives.
61 posted on
04/14/2006 10:34:22 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
To: sinkspur
I got my Disney characters mixed up in my first line.
Klayman was Cinderella, not Sleeping Beauty, to some here. I don't know how I could attribute "beauty" to Klayman's ugly mug.
62 posted on
04/14/2006 10:39:14 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
To: sinkspur
I remember those days and those solicitations. So much enthusiasm for JW's efforts to unveil problems in Clinton's administration too!
I never gave them a penny and aren't I glad! It certainly made me more cynical.
63 posted on
04/14/2006 10:40:30 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(America for Americans: No amnesty.)
To: sinkspur
I sent JD $25 or $29.95 one time for a Judicial Watch wrist watch.
NEVER received the watch.
I should have sued. LOL!
67 posted on
04/14/2006 10:43:57 PM PDT by
onyx
(It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
To: sinkspur
Well, hey. In 1998 things were bleak. People were desperate, I suppose. Speaking for myself, by 1999 I was foaming at the mouth, watching Bill & Hill get by with crime after crime after crime. By then the Senate had passed on the rape evidence and it was apparent they were compromised.
< /blatant intellectualization >
To: sinkspur
Why are you attacking Lamberth?
85 posted on
04/14/2006 10:53:33 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: sinkspur
LOL... and we said a little later on, "At least it will all be documented for posterity."
Whut?
...Chicken Butt
93 posted on
04/14/2006 10:57:54 PM PDT by
higgmeister
(In the Shadow of The Big Chicken.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson