Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carolinamom

i remember hearing (although i don't know if it is true) that shakespeare wrote his portrayal of the evil Richard III in part to curry favor with the House of Tudor. if this claim is accurate, there were propogandistic as well as literary motives at work when shakespeare wrote.


10 posted on 04/14/2006 3:23:40 PM PDT by nechayev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: nechayev

Which view do you want, the period piece or the modern analysis?


12 posted on 04/14/2006 3:29:22 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: nechayev

Shakespeare's histories both dramatically instructed and entertained the English, and I've read that Queen Elizabeth encouraged him to write them. At any rate, they're superb.


13 posted on 04/14/2006 3:33:51 PM PDT by Carolinamom (Daily legal immigrant to FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: nechayev
i remember hearing (although i don't know if it is true) that shakespeare wrote his portrayal of the evil Richard III in part to curry favor with the House of Tudor.

Quite true. Henry Tudor, hero to Richard's villainy, was Elizabeth's grandfather. To portray RIII as anything else would have been tantamount to accusing the Tudors of Regicide and usurping the throne.

38 posted on 04/18/2006 12:05:41 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson