Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archbishop may defy migrant rules (San Antonio/South Texas)
San Antonio Express-News ^ | 14 April 2006 | J. Michael Parker

Posted on 04/14/2006 2:35:21 PM PDT by Racehorse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: Racehorse; sinkspur
HR 4437 does not criminalize humanitarian assistance, nor does it criminalize anyone who is unaware of a criminal alien's unlawful presence in our country, nor does it criminalize a priest ministering communion.

This is pure sensationalism designed to sway those without the ability or desire to educate themselves on its provisions. Only knowingly aiding and abetting someone who is here illegally to remain here in defiance of the law is illegal.

Full Text HR 4437

I suspect that most here making those types of claims are full aware of their basic falsehood. HR 4437 is an exceptionally well conceived and written piece of legislation that will have exactly the desired effect of greatly reducing illegal immigration (which is why its' detractors are so vehemently opposed to it).

21 posted on 04/14/2006 3:19:54 PM PDT by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

The article says he's an immigrant. Wonder if he's a citizen. In any case, if he disobeys our laws, he should be deported.


22 posted on 04/14/2006 3:22:29 PM PDT by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
I'm sick of the fair weather Catholics and Protestant "friends" of Catholics as long as the issue suits them.

Oh so now it's the usual Catholic "pick on the Protestants'time eh?...

Didn't you guys get enough blood out of us during the Inquistion?...;)

Photographic proof


23 posted on 04/14/2006 3:22:46 PM PDT by joesnuffy ( 'This Guest Worker Program' is the only way to keep us safe and warm at night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
Sounds to me, like the Archdiocese of San Antonio just gave the IRS cause to pull its' tax exemption. After all, it's leader just said he would not obey the law of the land. . .

Do you advocate the same pulling of the tax exemption when bishops speak out against abortion, over and over and over?

It's the "law of the land" too.

501c3s can advocate for or against policies; they cannot advocate for or against candidates.

24 posted on 04/14/2006 3:22:53 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.

Catholics will always choose the Church, regardless of the law.

No, they won't. I am a Catholic - irrespective of your qualifier 'true' - and if my local church decides that it is going to break the law, then I walk.

25 posted on 04/14/2006 3:23:10 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx

You are welcome.


26 posted on 04/14/2006 3:24:42 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus

Gomez and his entire Diocese should be subjected to Federal Tax for politicking as a PAC.

I wonder how Gomez came here.

Was he indeed an "immigrant" or an illegal invader?


27 posted on 04/14/2006 3:25:55 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
Please don't ask Catholics to choose between politicized issues and The Church. True Catholics will always choose the Church, regardless of the law.

You would also be willing to suffer the consequences of violating the law, I assume?

Remember, it was the fear that Catholics would consider themselves above the law that led to strong the anti-Catholic feelings a century ago.

28 posted on 04/14/2006 3:29:53 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
HR 4437 does not criminalize humanitarian assistance, nor does it criminalize anyone who is unaware of a criminal alien's unlawful presence in our country, nor does it criminalize a priest ministering communion.

What does it say about priests or ministers who KNOW that an illegal alien is illegal, yet gives him food and water and sends him on his way?

There is either sufficient obscurity in the language to lead to the conclusion that criminal penalties could extend to clergy and social workers if they assist illegals, or the bishops who have spoken out have cleverly seized upon an impression of HR 4437 that have caused its authors to make certain that the language is clear where ministry and physical assistance is concerned.

The House bill as it stands is not going to become law and will accommodate Senate provisions or there will be no bill passed at all.

29 posted on 04/14/2006 3:32:28 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar
Remember, it was the fear that Catholics would consider themselves above the law that led to strong the anti-Catholic feelings a century ago.

Yes, and there was plenty of persecution of Catholics, especially Irish, as a result of the phony notion that the Pope was somehow going to interfere in US policy.

Would you feel the same way about the Church if priests and bishops broke the law regarding violating privacy zones around abortion clinics?

30 posted on 04/14/2006 3:35:30 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

SPEAKING in one thing: free speech is an absolute right.

DOING is something entirely different. Break the law, go to jail, lose tax exemption, etc.


31 posted on 04/14/2006 3:40:58 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
http://www.sendabrick.com

In reply to these bums you can do the following:

I sent my two bricks (cost $9.10 requiring signature and ability to track) and used the following in a letter. Taped my letter on the front of the brick after I wrapped it in cardboard. I then put it in the US Post Office Priority Mail, "Flat Rate Envelope". I sent one to Frist and the other to Hastert. Thanks to Paine in the Neck for the suggestion (shown again below)--Good Job.

U.S Constitution

Art. I, Sec. 8

"The Congress shall have the Power To...provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurections and repel Invasions..."

Art. IV, Sec. 4

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion..."

Art. VI., par. 3

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;..."

U. S. Senate Oath of Office

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."

U. S. House of Representatives Oath of Office

"I, ..., do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

You want votes? You want money? Do your damned duty! Secure the borders and get the illegal aliens out.

32 posted on 04/14/2006 3:46:17 PM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Yes, and there was plenty of persecution of Catholics, especially Irish, as a result of the phony notion that the Pope was somehow going to interfere in US policy.

And it wouldn't be such a phony notion after all if the Pope told Catholics to aid illegal aliens in violation of US laws, and they did it.

As for protest laws, I question the constitutionality of those, but people who violate ones that pass the test should be prepared to suffer the consequences (usually a night in jail or small fine).

33 posted on 04/14/2006 3:48:40 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
"Sounds to me, like the Archdiocese of San Antonio just gave the IRS cause to pull its' tax exemption. After all, it's leader just said he would not obey the law of the land. . ."

Worse than that, if the government can prove an ongoing criminal conspiracy, those involved could be indicted under RICO. My, oh my, wouldn't that be interesting.
34 posted on 04/14/2006 3:51:13 PM PDT by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
DOING is something entirely different. Break the law, go to jail, lose tax exemption, etc.

Who has DONE anything? These bishops are perfectly willing to go to jail, which, if they did over this issue, would be a PR nightmare for the government.

35 posted on 04/14/2006 3:54:23 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar
It wasn't fear it was bigotry, ignorance and hatred. They didn't call the KKK - Koons Kykes and Katholics out of fear.

You honestly think those postcards that were mailed in 1928 stating that the Holland Tunnel was being dug so Al Smith would be able to drive directly to the Vatican were sent out of fear?

36 posted on 04/14/2006 3:54:33 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

This church needs to loose it non-profit status for taking a political stand and choosing to ignore the law of the land.


37 posted on 04/14/2006 3:56:03 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever (Buy Danish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Do you advocate the same pulling of the tax exemption when bishops speak out against abortion, over and over and over? It's the "law of the land" too."

Vocal advocacy of a change to a law is one thing. Actively breaking the law is quite different. How about if the good bishop were to decide to tackle the abortion issue by getting the church staff under his command to murder doctors who perform abortions?

Using an enterprise to actively and knowingly violate the law is precisely the motivation for the passing and enforcement of the RICO statutes. As such, if the good bishop carried through on his threat to violate the law by harboring and actively assisting illegal immigrant criminals, he may we be exposing his archdiocese to far more than just a tax problem with the IRS...
38 posted on 04/14/2006 3:57:30 PM PDT by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
free speech is an absolute right

No it isn't, re shouting fire in a crowded theater.

39 posted on 04/14/2006 3:57:49 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Conservative4Ever
This church needs to loose it non-profit status for taking a political stand and choosing to ignore the law of the land.

For the umpteenth time, any 501c3 is allowed to advocate on behalf of a cause or policy.

No law has been broken because no bill has been passed. And no bill will be passed that might lead these bishops to break the law.

40 posted on 04/14/2006 3:59:15 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson