To: steve-b
any legal eagles...how come the 5th ammendment no longer seems to work here?
19 posted on
04/14/2006 1:47:20 PM PDT by
mo
To: mo
any legal eagles...how come the 5th ammendment no longer seems to work here? Oh come on, the Constitution is just so passe these days. As far as Bush's government is concerned, they can have ANY info on you that is being kept by a third party without even bothering with a warrant.
To: mo
any legal eagles...how come the 5th ammendment no longer seems to work here?
5th ammendment? I saw it at a thrift shop next to the 10th ammendment. No 16th ammendment though.
40 posted on
04/14/2006 6:50:40 PM PDT by
Kokojmudd
(Outsource GM to a Red State! Put Walmart in charge of all Federal agencies!)
To: mo
Current law states that any records that are over six months old require only a warrent to see. Records less than six months old require a subpeona.
That's why Google's policy of making it difficult to delete your Gmails is so pernicious.
46 posted on
04/14/2006 8:44:29 PM PDT by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson