Nonsequitur. The president can, as a matter of politics, make such a statement without "supporting" the marches themselves. It's certainly better than riots.
It is quite certain, moreover, that the WH did not "support" the marches in any material way, like the DNC and the usual suspects did.
Did he praise the Minutemen for acting "democratically"?
No, he called them vigilantes.
Our President supports the right of criminals to protest openly in our streets, and spits on the citizen who tries to stop this madness.
IMO, his deliberate failure to close the borders after 9-11 is an impeachable offense.
"It's certainly better than riots."
It's highly unlikely that any politically acceptable attempt at resolving the problem of illegal aliens will satisfy these marchers, who appear determined to intimidate through sheer numbers, with the unspoken threat of violence implicit in those numbers. The end result will be rioting, either way. So, it's not an either-or situation. As best I can tell, riots are virtually assured at this point.
Let me get this straight. We have criminals who invaded our country and who are protesting in mass for rights. And, our president is pleased that they are expressing discontent democratically and is pleased that they at least are not rioting.
What a pathetic mess!