Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CDHart
It's actually more than a property crime. The professor is an employee of a state institution. She is therefore an agent of the state, who in that capacity incited others to suppress the speech of those who planted the crosses in the first place. If that isn't state action in violation of the First Amendment, I don't know what is. How about a civil action against the professor, the university, and the State for this civil rights violation?

Incidentally, this "professor" probably supports Planned Parenthood counseling that is based on the premise that a fetus is not a human being while at the same time she believes that a visible statement that a fetus is a human being is worthy of suppression.

30 posted on 04/14/2006 10:18:59 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: p. henry
That's a flawed logic on her part, isn't it?

Carolyn

36 posted on 04/14/2006 10:38:57 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson