I may have missed something when I read the full article but I didn't see anything anti-military. It's true the free dinners won't be available to our wounded personnal at that location but I don't see the decision to use the space for something else as anti-military.
It's a business decision with consequences I'm not happy about, but business is too often a cold hearted undertaking run by people without a heart.
The restaurant can continue to offer the same gesture of thanks if it chooses to open in another location.
"I don't see the decision to use the space for something else as anti-military."
Did you see what they are going to use the space for? If so, clue the rest of us in.