I actually will give the woman a pass on this one. If she had truly been raped (by the athletes or anyone else) and was stunned she might be unwilling to get out of the car and that might cause the first reporting officer to conclude she was on drugs or drunk when that might not be the case. If they administered no test, they can't really say if she was or not.
I think this information is taken out of context much the way the hateful e-mail by the lacrosse player has been. It looks different now than it would have seemed at the time.
I would assume the hosital took her blood. A blood test would show the level of alcohol consumption.
She showed up at the Lacrosse house at 11:30pm - already drunk according to the photos dicussed by the defense lawyers. This police call just confirms that.
Exactly. Which is why if this goes to trial, any testimony by this officer about the plaintiff's state of intoxication will likely be inadmissable. I know I'd move to have it excluded if I were the prosecutor.
If she was so pitiful, why was "Kim" wanting her out of her car? If she was suffering, why wouldn't she have asked Kim to take her to the hospital?
Why was she in her nightgown? She left the party in her dance costume which was a body suit with some lingerie over it. Where'd the nightgown come from?
Anybody have any ideas? Did she borrow it from Kim? If so, did she deliberately tear up the costume she left the party in? Did it come from doing her last trick before the party or after? Was it checked for foreign DNA? If anybody's DNA except hers is on the nightgown, it might be a big clue as to who did what to her, if anything, and when.