[Old_Mil]

Interesting that you quote the Washington Blade. But the information is correct. That article is from April of 2004

Those are just the results of a google search, the fastest reference I had to post information I knew was correct. CWA I recommend as a general source, the Washington Blade was merely for this one reference as I haven't vetted the site.

The bottom line is that Allen has waffled on pro-life issues, on gay-agenda issues, and is not opposed to granting an amnesty to illegal aliens.

I won't vote for such a candidate.

[Corin Stormhands]

Those are just the results of a google search, the fastest reference I had to post information I knew was correct.

And the information you "knew was correct" I proved incorrect.

That said, Allen has not waffled, if you understand the issues. And he has said he opposes amnesty. Anyone who thinks we're going to deport 10 million illegal aliens is dreaming. It's NOT going to happen. We have to accept that and figure the issue out from there.

You don't have to like Allen. You don't have to vote for him. But don't make your decision on incorrect information.

[Waywardson]

Interesting that you quote the Washington Blade. But the information is correct. That article is from April of 2004

Those are just the results of a google search, the fastest reference I had to post information I knew was correct. CWA I recommend as a general source, the Washington Blade was merely for this one reference as I haven't vetted the site.

The bottom line is that Allen has waffled on pro-life issues, on gay-agenda issues, and is not opposed to granting an amnesty to illegal aliens.

I won't vote for such a candidate.

---

Yeah, Washington Blade outed more of Allen's staff than any other Senator on the hill. They called his office "The Gayest on the Hill". What did Allen do when he wanted to run for President? He got all the homosexuals jobs with the RSC. Go figure...