Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo
There are concerns about SI, but I'm not yet convinced we will have the technology to do it in this century. I mentioned possibly using wetware and quantum computers to do it, but that's just educated guesswork. It *might* work, and it may not.

Humans also have a blessed disinclination to carry anything to it's ultimate apocalyptic conclusion. Hopefully, that trend will hold if it turns out that it is possible.
40 posted on 04/13/2006 9:04:19 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Socialism is based on how things should be. Capitalism is based on how things are, and deals with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: JamesP81
There are concerns about SI, but I'm not yet convinced we will have the technology to do it in this century.

I hope you are right. I favor a quarentined SI/nanotech solution, with assured "reboot" capability, maybe to the surface of the Moon or Venus.

Nuclear weapons were much easier to control, once they were developed. SI/nanotech will be extraordinary difficult to control, if they are developed at all.

43 posted on 04/13/2006 9:13:08 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson