Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Face Uphill Battle to Retake House
Washington Post ^ | April 13, 2006 | Jonathan Weisman

Posted on 04/12/2006 10:21:27 PM PDT by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last
To: TXBSAFH
We have a najority but republicans are not controlling the agenda and the rinos in many cases are not helping.

Gun control is off the agenda because Republicans control congress. So is socialized medicine, middle class tax increases, and rationing of or price controls on gasoline.

To see how bad the Democrats could make the United States look no further than europe.

The place to push the party to the right is in the primaries. In November support the party unless the candidate is a socialist. In which case you're probably in a yellow dog Democrat state or district and there's no real choice and never will be.
121 posted on 04/13/2006 3:02:22 AM PDT by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
Yep, leave you conscience and morals at home and vote for the lesser of two evils.

or

Reach into that toilet and pick up the small piece of s**t.

---
Or you can remember Ben Franklin.

We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.

But maybe you consider suicide a viable option.

Good luck with that.
122 posted on 04/13/2006 3:27:32 AM PDT by Cheburashka (World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

To: Cheburashka

After the amnesty proposals, Meirs, runaway spending, cfr, etc I am seeing less and less differnece between the rats and the dems. I am off the respencican plantation.


124 posted on 04/13/2006 3:34:31 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector

Indubitably... and capitalism begets communism.


125 posted on 04/13/2006 3:41:10 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
Currently, there is very little difference between the two parties.

Both true and false. On some issues there is very little difference in the way they are resolved. I have a TON of criticisms of the Republican party (I am not a registered Republican, but rather a Libertarian), but one would have to be blind to miss the deep philosophical chasm that separates the two parties.

After everything is said and done, though, we have a representative republic, and that means the leaders we have are US. The corruption, dishonesty, thievery, cowardice and general smarminess you see from Congress is a mirror image of what is in society. That is why we will NEVER see change from the top down, unless we scrap our system of government altogether. In a free society, change always bubbles up, rather than trickles down. At the risk of sounding like a raving fundamentalist, a Christian revival is the best and last hope for our system of gov't as it is. Perhaps you know of another source of societal transformation, but my review of history shows none.

Otherwise, we will see frustration mount from otherwise good people like yourself, who will increasingly and willingly cede more and more power to another savior, in the vain hope that they will do what we cannot find the courage and influence to do ourselves. I see this both on the issue of terrorism, immigration, and the "war on drugs." We see things that should be done, and we are frustrated over our inability to make them happen, and so we call for ever increasing expansion of federal powers so that the fed can impose our will on a recalcitrant population. We are voting for the very destruction of our society with the best of intentions, in the name of saving it.

In that area, you are correct, there is very little difference between the two parties. In fact, in that area, there is very little difference between many freepers and the socialist loons over at the daily Kos. Both are more enamoured with their pet issues ("security", immigration, etc) than freedom, and are willing to kill freedom in the name of saving it.

126 posted on 04/13/2006 3:45:18 AM PDT by luthers_inkwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
What's the difference. Frist and his boys are going to sell this country down the river anyway.

I understand what you wrote, but have you ever tried to change the minds of liberal politicians? Frist et.al. are not ideal, but they beat the alternative.

127 posted on 04/13/2006 3:54:43 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

thanks for posting this one. It explains why the MSM and Democrats are united as never before to attack, malign, and destroy George Bush. The MSM wants democrats to regain power so they can have the fun of covering censure or even impeachment proceedings. Democrats want to oblige them.

Here comes the good news, money quote. Any quote from the Cook Political Report can be taken very seriously, and here is a big one, good news for us:

""If this election comes down to the individual, race-by-race, case-by-case campaigns, like we've seen for the last four cycles, the Democrats don't have enough top-tier candidates to win 15 seats," Amy Walters, a House political analyst at the nonpartisan Cook Political Report, said, referring to a net gain. "But they do have enough second- and third-tier candidates who can ride a wave."


128 posted on 04/13/2006 5:02:11 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I've said it before and will again.

Mid-terms are about base turnout. If you are a Republican, the GOP base currently outmatches the Dem base.

Doing things that infuriate your base is damn stupid. They won't lose because Democrats convert more voters. They could lose because their own sit home.


129 posted on 04/13/2006 5:39:44 AM PDT by Soul Seeker ("No Illegal Alien Left Behind Act" - (quote: Jeff Sessions) - 4/6/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Bush will just refuse to enforce anything but the amnesty, anyway.


130 posted on 04/13/2006 5:42:49 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
PeROT was not running against klintoon, but was running against Bush.
It's what "conservative" third parties do.

I also believe that Nader and the Greens ran aganst Gore.

Third party candidacies always are a form of fratricide against the major candidate to whom they are most similar. They are "better," when better is the enemy of good enough (or, in the case of Gore, bad enough).


131 posted on 04/13/2006 5:43:03 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I guess you think 60% of FR is "Dem operatives", according to the latest poll.

I can't believe the number of people who are deluding themselves.


132 posted on 04/13/2006 5:46:43 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Well, there is the Republican party with some conservative members and some not so conservative and then there's the evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat Party. I'd rather have a conservative Republican in office, but I'll take a not so conservative Republican over any evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat any day of the week. And I might express my unhappiness with some of his policies but I think I've learned my lesson about irreversibly trashing the Republican office holder or the Republican base or the party itself (at least not too much trashing). As they say, the alternative is unthinkable.

Jim Robinson is not just right, he's damn right.

133 posted on 04/13/2006 6:12:46 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector

Maybe it's the Do you prefer Dog food or Cat food argument.


134 posted on 04/13/2006 6:21:27 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector

"The moderates run both parties."

Actually, the Far left and Far Right run both parties. They have the money. The moderates are trying to have it both ways(which is why they are moderates and have no convictions)


135 posted on 04/13/2006 6:22:46 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

There is nothing new under the sun.

Look, we all know this. This is not rocket science. Incumbency is awesomely powerful. A vote or non vote to punish the GOP by not being conservative enough is a vote that cannot be undone for decades. Yes, decades. If you live in a marginal district, that is, one where the winner wins by < 10%, then giving a seat to a Dem seals in fundraising advantages and advantages in having staff go to Soc Security offices for constituents and all sorts of incredibly powerful realities That Cannot Be Undone.

A brief exercise in petulance turns into decades of condemning your family and neighbors to life under a hard core leftist who will ALWAYS vote for far left Democratic leadership in the House hierarchy and for Speaker.

This is simply not rocket science and not new. You vote to nominate who you want nominated. If you don't get your preferred nomination, it is YOUR fault, not the party's. YOU didn't work hard enough for that candidate. YOU didn't fund raise enough. YOU didn't make your case well enough and YOU didn't persuade enough people.

Once past the primaries, you vote to deny the leftward most candidate who is viable power. Period and full stop. Doing otherwise is unprincipled and immoral.


136 posted on 04/13/2006 6:25:32 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"The Perot voters gave us 8 long years of Clinton."

And in Wisconsin, the Libertarian voters who voted for goofy Ed Thompson, have given us many l-o-n-g years of "Diamond Jim" Doyle (D, WI) as Governor. His motto is "Pay to Play" to business, special interest groups, teachers and union thugs.

Having witnessed it myself, your theory is sound in my book. :)


137 posted on 04/13/2006 6:33:07 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Amen, Brother!


138 posted on 04/13/2006 6:40:39 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The Perot voters gave us 8 long years of Clinton.

And hence the Contract With America was born along with a Senate and House majority. Look what happens when the Republicans get slapped by their own, they re evaluate their priorities.

139 posted on 04/13/2006 6:43:58 AM PDT by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: normy

You are an advocate of Democrat victory and are on the wrong website. Your convoluted logic is irrelevant. There is no nuance to victory. You either oppose leftist victory or you do not.


140 posted on 04/13/2006 6:54:52 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson