Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: callmejoe; Calpernia; Naptowne; nw_arizona_granny; Rushmore Rocks; Velveeta; WestCoastGal

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/04/15/1144521544495.html

'One storm' decoded as nuclear hit
By Tim Butcher
April 16, 2006


PRESIDENT Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran has issued Israel with a veiled threat of a nuclear attack, describing it as a "rotten, dried tree" that would be annihilated by "one storm".

In his most vitriolic and anti-Semitic attack to date, Mr Ahmadinejad warned on Friday that Israel faced imminent destruction.

While he did not refer explicitly to nuclear weapons, his reference to the "one storm" that would do away with Israel was seen as a code for nuclear Armageddon.

Iran does not yet have nuclear weapons but Tehran is widely believed to be bent on developing its own nuclear military capability, in defiance of international protocols and peace treaties. Friday's outburst will only worsen the stand-off between Iran and the big powers over its nuclear ambitions.

President George Bush, like many US leaders before him, is an ardent supporter of Israel and his Administration would not stand by if Iran posed a threat to it.

Israel has warned it would not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear capability. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons although it never publicly admits this.

Speaking at the opening of a conference in Tehran to support the Palestinian cause, Mr Ahmadinejad repeated earlier anti-Semitic attacks on Israel, questioning the scale of the Holocaust and attacking Zionism.

"Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation," he said. "The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm."

He poured scorn on the established history of the Holocaust, saying an atrocity committed in Europe should be settled in Europe.

"If such a disaster is true, why should the people of this region pay the price? Why does the Palestinian nation have to be suppressed and have its land occupied?"

The land of Palestine, he said, referring to the British mandated territory that includes all of Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, "will be freed soon". He did not say how.

Mr Ahmadinejad was speaking days after Israel's chief of military intelligence, Major General Amos Yadlin, said Iran could develop a nuclear bomb "within three years, by the end of the decade".


79 posted on 04/15/2006 1:08:16 PM PDT by callmejoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: callmejoe; Calpernia; Naptowne; nw_arizona_granny; Rushmore Rocks; Velveeta; WestCoastGal

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1143498859737&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

IDF: Too late to stop Teheran diplomatically




Yaakov Katz and Herb Keinon, THE JERUSALEM POST Apr. 16, 2006




With projections that Iran could develop a nuclear bomb within the next two-and-a-half years, a high-ranking IDF officer from Military Intelligence told The Jerusalem Post over the weekend that the successful enrichment of uranium announced last week proved that diplomatic efforts to stop Teheran's race to the bomb had failed.

"The way it looks now, it is doubtful that the United Nations and the international efforts will succeed in stopping Iran," the high-ranking officer said. "Iran spit in the world's face but the world hasn't done anything."

On Friday Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad fired a series of verbal shots at Israel, saying it was a "permanent threat" to the Middle East that will "soon" be liberated, and questioning the validity of the Holocaust.

"Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation," Ahmadinejad said at the opening of a three-day conference in support of the Palestinians attended by Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and other Hamas members. "The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm," he said.

Although Israel had no official response to Ahmadinejad, Shimon Peres said that the Iranian president's words were reminiscent of those of Saddam Hussein, and that his "end will be similar."

Peres issued a statement saying that Ahmadinejad "represents Satan, and not God." History, he said, has denounced "madmen and those who wave the sword, and all those who acted this way ended their careers accordingly."

With that, Peres said that Israel needed to let the US and the international community lead the campaign to protect the world from the Iranian leader.

In an Israel Radio interview, Peres said Saturday that "Iran is a United Nations member state threatening another UN member state, and the international organization will not let this go unheeded."

"The Iranian president is uniting the entire world against him," he said. "Israel is following his statements and actions closely, but does not wish to respond to them."

Indeed, the Foreign Ministry had no response Saturday night to Ahmadinejad's comments.

On Tuesday, Ahmadinejad announced that Iran had passed one of the major hurdles in its race to obtain nuclear power and had, for the first time, successfully enriched uranium.

But while only a battery of 164 centrifuges was used to enrich the uranium to 3.5 percent, according to the IDF officer it was only a matter of time before Iran obtained technology allowing for the operation of thousands of centrifuges over a period of several months which could produce highly-enriched uranium at 90% - the amount needed for a nuclear bomb.

The officer noted that Iran was in the process of developing nuclear arms in a separate program run parallel and alongside the Islamic republic's publicly-known and claimed-to-be civilian nuclear program.

"It is more probable that they have a second and secret plan [to develop nuclear arms] and they will copy the technology they are now developing in the open and use it in a secret location," the officer said.

Iran, the officer predicted, would obtain independent research and development capabilities - sometimes referred to as the "point of no return" - in a matter of months, technically allowing it to move forward with its nuclear program without external assistance.

"Once they succeeded in enriching uranium at 3.5% there is nothing really technologically stopping them from enriching at 90%," he asserted.

But after successfully enriching uranium, Iran's next test would be to operate thousands of centrifuges for more than just a few days. "The goal is to keep them going for several months without breaking down or falling apart," he explained. "The fact that they know how to do it for several days is not enough."

While Israel needed to fear a nuclear attack by Iran, the threat was shared by the entire world and needed to be taken care of appropriately, the officer said. Tough and immediate sanctions could still potentially suspend and stop Iran's nuclear program, he added.

"The diplomatic efforts made until now have been exhausted," he said, "and it is now time for a diplomatic process with sharp teeth."

The Iranian president provoked a world outcry last October when he said Israel should be "wiped off the map."

On Friday, he repeated his previous line on the Holocaust, saying: "If such a disaster is true, why should the people of this region pay the price? Why does the Palestinian nation have to be suppressed and have its land occupied?"

The land of Palestine, he said, "will be freed soon." He did not say how this would be achieved, but insisted to the audience of at least 900 people: "Believe that Palestine will be freed soon."

"The existence of this (Israeli) regime is a permanent threat" to the Middle East, he added. "Its existence has harmed the dignity of Islamic nations."


80 posted on 04/15/2006 8:48:18 PM PDT by callmejoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: callmejoe
'One storm' decoded as nuclear hit

I wondered about that phrase. It conjurs up an image of 'one cloud'.

What I can't figure out is wehre they wouuld unleash a nuke. They'll try to get it on American soil, but that may be more difficult than storming something within range of their new shiny missiles.

Would they nuke Iraq and take out a bunch of our military with them? Or perhaps a port?

I don't think they'd nuke Israel because of the holy sites.

83 posted on 04/17/2006 8:24:52 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson