Are you out of your mind???? The DA stated that even tho the results of the DNA tests on the 3 students alleged to have been involved in the rape proved negative, 75% of all assaults can not be substantiated by DNA.
If the alleged assault was allegedly committed by 3 individuals, then by his own admission, ONE OF THEM SHOULD HAVE TESTED POSITIVE! AND THEY DID NOT!!!!!
And you sit here and try to tell the rest of us that by hiring an attorney to fight this obvious case of societal extortion is an admission of guilt????
You're on the wrong forum pal!
It was more of a Clinton joke than anything else.
You must be guilty if you hire a known rapist's lawyer to defend you......
Go pee on someone else's leg.
I am having a hard time hearing the whole rationale that "just because there's no DNA doesn't mean a rape didn't happen." If that's the case....why are men accused of rape getting out of prison SOLELY because DNA results come back negative? Shouldn't those prisoners, based on this DA's rationale, still be incarcerated despite the fact that DNA evidence doesn't match?
I agree with you.