Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. bill limits sales of items related to drug use
The Washington Times ^ | 4-12-06 | Amy Doolittle

Posted on 04/12/2006 10:54:44 AM PDT by JZelle

The D.C. Council is considering legislation that would prevent vendors such as gas stations and liquor stores from buying and selling items that could enable illegal drug use. The proposed legislation, which amends drug-paraphernalia legislation passed in 1982, would make it illegal to sell cigarette rolling papers or cigar leaf wrappers in stores that make less than 5 percent of their revenue from the sale of tobacco. "There are some things that are normally only used for illegal drugs," said council member Phil Mendelson, an at-large Democrat who is running for re-election. "We want to make it illegal for users to buy those things."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: dc; parapheralia; rollingpapers; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2006 10:54:46 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

This is a blatant attempt to curtail people who roll their own because they are not affected by the cig tax. What jerks!


2 posted on 04/12/2006 10:58:51 AM PDT by calex59 (No country can survive multiculturalism. Dual cultures don't mix, history has taught us that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

More failed war on some drugs madness.


3 posted on 04/12/2006 11:00:21 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Naw, the idiots in dc really think it'll cut down on Drug use. More lunacy from the failed liberal experiment. I wonder how Marion Barry feels about this legislation.
4 posted on 04/12/2006 11:07:06 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
"I believe the bill will pass, but I expect that there will be considerable amendments to deal with the constitutional issues," he said. "You can't just lock people up because of some piece of property. ... We can't outlaw test tubes in the District of Columbia because we would probably have some very upset medical facilities, plus we could create a black market for some of those things."

Constitutional issues? Why should that bother anyone any more? But seriously, this is all quite silly. I've heard of "pipes" made out of toilet paper tubes and aluminum foil, automobile carburetors, baby bottles, and even Styrofoam cups. This is just more "feel-good" legislation and won't have any effect except to deprive a few small businesses of some revenue.

5 posted on 04/12/2006 11:07:24 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
"would make it illegal to sell cigarette rolling papers or cigar leaf wrappers in stores that make less than 5 percent of their revenue from the sale of tobacco. 'There are some things that are normally only used for illegal drugs,'"

But you can just trot down to the tobacco shop in the same town and pick them up?! This is asinine, if the item itself isn't illegal, why are they making laws that simply make it a bit more inconvenient to pick it up. Do they think people are going to be unconvinced into giving up drugs?!
6 posted on 04/12/2006 11:08:50 AM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Cottage industries coming right up. Fools all who think they can stop illegal drugs, so long as the demand is there, supply will fulfill the need.

Legalize the crap, make it cheap, let the idiots OD and clear out the human debris so inclined to self destruct.


7 posted on 04/12/2006 11:09:17 AM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tfecw

People will stop buying rolling papers and just use a pipe. Works for me.:)


8 posted on 04/12/2006 11:10:59 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The bill also would make it the buyer or seller's responsibility to prove that the items will not be used for illegal drugs, instead of requiring the police to prove the particular item's illegal use.

Words fail me.
9 posted on 04/12/2006 11:12:32 AM PDT by xenophiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

"But you can just trot down to the tobacco shop in the same town and pick them up?! This is asinine, if the item itself isn't illegal, why are they making laws that simply make it a bit more inconvenient to pick it up. Do they think people are going to be unconvinced into giving up drugs?!"

Look for a bill next year to take down the names & addresses of the folks buying papers/wraps.


10 posted on 04/12/2006 11:17:22 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

There goes my bathroom mirror project.


11 posted on 04/12/2006 11:18:08 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tfecw

Big Bamboo. I knew I kept that album for some reason.


12 posted on 04/12/2006 11:19:09 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Wait until they start taxing toilet paper, aluminum foil and scotch tape.


13 posted on 04/12/2006 11:21:43 AM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xenophiles
Guilty till proven innocent.

All that is not specifically authorized is prohibited.

14 posted on 04/12/2006 11:22:46 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Have no drug warriors yet stepped forward to defend this? Do we have to ping them?


15 posted on 04/12/2006 11:50:07 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

This is great new!

This means that, obviously, the police have already finished getting all the rapists and murderers and theives off the street and can now concentrate on....um.... rolling papers...

..right?


16 posted on 04/12/2006 11:50:38 AM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

What next?

Oh, I know!

Ban the selling of apples and those little honey-bear bottles...come on you all, you know what I'm talking about about!


17 posted on 04/12/2006 11:52:45 AM PDT by jbenedic2 (Nothing new for the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bones75

When cigarette rolling papers are outlawed, only outlaws...all hell, you know what I mean.


18 posted on 04/12/2006 11:53:42 AM PDT by jbenedic2 (Nothing new for the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jbenedic2

"What next?

Oh, I know!

Ban the selling of apples and those little honey-bear bottles...come on you all, you know what I'm talking about about!"

OH yeah... (*wink wink*)


19 posted on 04/12/2006 12:06:30 PM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xenophiles
The bill also would make it the buyer or seller's responsibility to prove that the items will not be used for illegal drugs, instead of requiring the police to prove the particular item's illegal use.

Me too bro, me too. "But officer I'm on my way to the tobacco shop to pick up tobacco, I get the papers here cause they are cheaper!"

20 posted on 04/12/2006 12:32:22 PM PDT by lovecraft (Specialization is for insects.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson