Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. wants judge off Indian case
AP ^ | 4/11/6 | JENNIFER TALHELM

Posted on 04/11/2006 3:35:18 PM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON - U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth has raised many an eyebrow with his adjective-laden opinions in favor of the thousands of American Indians suing the government for mismanaging billions of their dollars.

On Tuesday, an appeals court panel was asked to decide whether his rulings show he is too biased to continue with the 10-year-old lawsuit.

"It is exceptionally rare for us to make this request we are making today, and we make it urgently," Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler said, arguing that Lamberth should be removed from the case to "restore the appearance of fairness."

Lamberth, a Texas native and Reagan appointee, is well known for speaking his mind and setting high standards for the government when it appears in his courtroom.

Observers of the Indian trust case - called Cobell v. Norton - have said that after hearing years of arguments about the more than $100 billion in oil, gas, timber and other royalties Indians claim the government mishandled since 1887, Lamberth's frustration with the Interior Department is showing through.

But lawyers for the government argue he has gone far beyond that. On Tuesday, they said he has unacceptably charged the Interior Department with racism and that his opinions show he can no longer be objective.

The government petitioned to remove Lamberth after a July decision, in which he ordered the department to tell Indians that its information on trust assets may not be credible.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; americanindians; cobellvnorton; lamberth; lawsuit
Yeah, I know who appointed him, and I still don't like the way he's handled this case.
1 posted on 04/11/2006 3:35:23 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
...Indians claim the government mishandled since 1887...

The Indians shouldn't feel special about this. The government has mishandled everything they've gotten ahold of including everyone's money.

2 posted on 04/11/2006 3:43:21 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I haven't seen anything on these cases in several years, but from what I last saw (around 1999), the government's conduct was enough to make ones blood boil.


3 posted on 04/11/2006 3:44:39 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

BUMP


4 posted on 04/11/2006 4:06:25 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Must be related to Judge Boldt.


5 posted on 04/11/2006 4:10:04 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He could be less vocal about it, but from what I've seen I like the way Lambeth has handled this case.

If anything, he has been extremely easy on the FedGov. The Govt. has badly mismanaged the trust funds, and Interior continues to stonewall and objuscate.


6 posted on 04/11/2006 4:14:42 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Maybe when he is done with the case for the indians we can hire him to go after Soc.Sec, Medicare, IRS, and INS for mishandling 'funds'.


7 posted on 04/11/2006 4:37:49 PM PDT by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
and Interior continues to stonewall and objuscate.

How so?

8 posted on 04/11/2006 4:40:05 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
in which he ordered the department to tell Indians that its information on trust assets may not be credible.

When exactly has the federal government been trustworthy or credible in the past 150 years? Why would they start now? This judge is right to tell the Indians not to trust them.

9 posted on 04/11/2006 4:40:54 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
...Interior continues to stonewall and objuscate.

I'm pretty sure "objuscate" isn't a word, but it should be!

10 posted on 04/11/2006 4:46:57 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson