[Vicomte13]

"The third prime is 5."

Sigh.
You're not getting in tune with the ZEN of the article...
5 may be the third prime, technically, but it can be disregarded for our purposes because then the product of the first three primes won't be 42.
Therefore, even though 5 is TECHNICALLY a "prime number", it's not in this case. It's a mathematical quantum particle that has no mass for our particular purposes.
Which proves that gravitrons exist.
Surely you see this.

[zeugma]

5 may be the third prime, technically, but it can be disregarded for our purposes because then the product of the first three primes won't be 42.

LOL!

Would that be the environmental whacko addendum to the theory?