[krb]

I suppose it's the product of the first three primes.

I counter-suppose that the number "5" would disagree with you.

[savedbygrace]

LOL. Well done.

[Vicomte13]

"I counter-suppose that the number "5" would disagree with you."

Yes, yes, yes, but if you do an analytical algebraic topology of local Euclidian meterizations of infinitely differential Riemannian manifolds (bor shamov!), you will see that 5 is a nullity for these purposes, a "zero", as the article so clearly stated, and it becomes intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that 42 is holy and gravitrons have no mass!

You've gotta get into the spirit of the article, man!