Skip to comments.
Council on Foreign Relations told of U.S. plans for Iran strike
World Tribune ^
| April 11, 2006
Posted on 04/11/2006 11:18:29 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
Great. Let's just wait a long time, all the while telling everyone all about it, so the Iranians have ample time to prepare!
Hey, it worked with Iraq, didn't it?
2
posted on
04/11/2006 11:20:11 AM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: West Coast Conservative
3
posted on
04/11/2006 11:20:20 AM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: pcottraux
Great. Let's just wait a long time, all the while telling everyone all about it, so the Iranians have ample time to prepare! That's called diplomacy.
4
posted on
04/11/2006 11:23:36 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: rhombus
What happened to speak softly and carry a big stick?
5
posted on
04/11/2006 11:26:40 AM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: West Coast Conservative
The latest "Cindy Sheehan" of the week.
6
posted on
04/11/2006 11:29:10 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: rhombus
7
posted on
04/11/2006 11:30:26 AM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: West Coast Conservative
D'UH!! The US military has contingency/strike plans for all sorts of global scenarios, not just Iran. Another example of the MSM's complete lack of knowledge about the military.
8
posted on
04/11/2006 11:31:13 AM PDT
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: ARCADIA
What happened to speak softly and carry a big stick?Using the big stick should be interesting this time. Will Bush go to Congress and do a mother-may-I if it comes to the stick? Surely he knows by now that the UN is wasted engergy as Russia and China will never authorize even sanctions let alone the use of a stick.
9
posted on
04/11/2006 11:31:21 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: rhombus
"Council on Foreign Relations told of U.S. plans for Iran strike" ----
The CFR is most likely in on it.
10
posted on
04/11/2006 11:36:37 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Oh, for the days when "disrespect" was just a noun.)
To: West Coast Conservative
If he intends to go into another war, Bush better do it after the November elections or GOP chances will fade.
11
posted on
04/11/2006 11:44:16 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
(John 17 - So that they may be one just as we are one.)
To: West Coast Conservative
Council on Foreign Relations told U.S. of its' plans for a Iran strike
There fixed it.
Good lord! this is worthy of the National Enquirer.
13
posted on
04/11/2006 11:45:58 AM PDT
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: West Coast Conservative
After the 06 elections. Fallujah.
Expect the allies of Iran to make a major diplomatic 'breakthrough' then.
Will it matter? I don't know.
14
posted on
04/11/2006 11:48:53 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: pcottraux
Let 'em prepare, if GW Bush has any brains he will destroy "all" of Iran's capability to produce oil. That action will destroy the Iranian government overnight. Then, after he does that, he should destroy all of the Iranian nuclear facilities, and destroy the ground and air forces of Syria the same day. End of problem. Some oil pain, but it will be worth it!!! USA has to act like Rome at its zenith of power. Or, there will be no USA is short shrift. If you are frightened of reality, you can vote Democrat and watch your families get abused, murdered and dispatched to the hereafter by Muslim terrorists, aided and abetted by the Democrat party. Wake up, America!!!
To: West Coast Conservative
Joseph Cirincione, director of the Washington-based Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceTrustees at the CEIP
Take a good look. Nuff said.
16
posted on
04/11/2006 11:53:30 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
17
posted on
04/11/2006 11:54:27 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: JLAGRAYFOX
Well, personally, I long for a less politically correct time where we could actually do stuff like that.
18
posted on
04/11/2006 11:54:59 AM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: ex-snook
The air strikes must be timed when our interests deem them necessary, i.e. well in advance of any chance the Iranians will acquire a nuclear weapon. Elections must be irrelevant. The consequences of a nuclear Iran are too great.
That said, I think the Republicans only chance this November is to re-focus this as a national security election, which, air strikes would do.
19
posted on
04/11/2006 11:56:06 AM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
To: West Coast Conservative
...preparing for the prospect of air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities in late 2006...
Yup, gotta wait 'til those pesky elections are behind us before we do anything really important.
20
posted on
04/11/2006 11:59:50 AM PDT
by
Cyclopean Squid
(History is a work in progress)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson