[HawaiianGecko]

A very great man once said something to the effect of, "Men will sin, but woe be to the one who helps them sin." The porn "industry" needs both suppliers and users. Both are guilty.

Good point and I agree. However, I have to ask the rhetorical question: "guilty of what?"  Maybe nature is guilty of giving us sexual urges. If porn caused the release of endorphins that made us sick instead of giving us a "good" feeling then there wouldn't be any complaint about porn. BUT, pictures of naked women would still be pictures of naked women.

 

[ArGee]

However, I have to ask the rhetorical question: "guilty of what?"

Of sin. That's why my post was referring to.

In this case, it's sexual sin. Sex is intended to create a lifetime bond between a man and a woman. This bond is to be the root of a family that begets good to both the children produced (or adopted) and to the society of which it is a part. Destroy the family and you destroy the society.

Sexual sin destroys the family. That's why G-d was so concerned with putting sex in its proper place. It's "G-d given place" if you will.

Shalom.