[mkjessup]

Happy to help:

http://www.tldm.org/news6/bundy.htm

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I have seen this before, do you really believe that Bundy was driven to kill women by pornography? How do you explain the fact that not all women have been killed?

Why don't YOU believe Bundy? And how many women HAVE to be killed before you acknowledge that there could be a connection? Bundy was a world class serial killer. He had nothing to gain by his entirely voluntary testimony because he already knew he was going to be executed. Are you suggesting that he made it all up on a lark?

Why of course.

[RipSawyer]

Why of course.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I don't know what Bundy's motivation was, obviously he was a crazed man so who knows, he may have believed it, but I don't consider him a reliable witness. I simply don't believe that the fact that someone enjoyed pornography means that that is the cause of his killing. There are plenty of people who have enjoyed pornography, and I confess to being one, who have never hurt anyone. So does pornography cause you to kill or to be peaceful? I certainly am extremely doubtful that anyone has been driven to murder by anything ever seen in Playboy. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is an old and outdated superstition.

[steve-b]

And how many women HAVE to be killed before you acknowledge that there could be a connection?

Sarah Brady called. She wants her overheated rhetoric back.

He had nothing to gain

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Clinton had nothing to gain by cheating at golf, either, but he did anyway. Ego-boosting gestures are what narcissistic personalities do.