Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RSmithOpt
See my post #21 above, and ...

The woman received (was subjected to) a complete physical. Post-rape-accusation physicals involving DNA tests are 'invasive.' They swabbed pretty much her entire internal and external surfaces for traces of external DNA -- hair, skin, saliva, seminal fluids and similar. They likely performed oral, anal and vaginal exams -- looking for evidence of bruises and tear and other physiological evidence. They should have looked at the arms of all the young men -- looking for scratches she may have inflicted during her struggles of being restrained and raped/sodomized by three men. They should have been able to find tissue bruises consistent with how she reported she was restrained. There should be dirt on her body (and other forensic evidence) consistent with where she was, and the position(s) she was in, on the bathroom floor (where the alleged rape(s) occurred.)

There's plenty of ways to gather damning evidence. So far the DA is "O-fer".

All this doesn't mean there is no evidence. It just means that so far there is no evidence to suggest the young men are guilty. Remember how we dinged Clinton for this -- "there's no evidence to suggest I lied/cheated/stole". IN other words, Clinton knew he got away with it. Maybe these boys are the same -- there's no evidence to catch them.

So far, it just looks like there's no evidence ... ;-)
37 posted on 04/11/2006 6:42:48 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag
I do not think this story needs to be compared to Slick's BS...this is a story has seriously damaged the community, the team, the players' families, the coach, the city, the university, the alleged victim and her family. I can grant you the players were thoroughly examined, documented, and 'tested' if any scratches were on them for any reason.

Remember that her story is full of holes and the players (almost all of them) have the same congruent story of what happened. At this point, I am 98% convinced they are innocent of rape, maybe not of indignant racial slurs, but not guilty of rape.

42 posted on 04/11/2006 7:00:32 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

This is ALL a scam. This woman stated she BROKE her nails off. I would presume she had also scratched some of the players. NO DNA and NO SKIN was found under the broken nails or under her remaining nails.

This woman needs to be put on trial NOW.


43 posted on 04/11/2006 7:01:48 AM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Breaking and Entering means Wealth Redistribution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson