Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Echo Talon

"6.1billion"

These days, 6.1 billion is not so much money. I believe it is less than the current cost of one Nimitz-class aircraft carrier and its air group. It would be money well spent. And you are quite right about the long-run savings.


519 posted on 04/11/2006 7:45:13 AM PDT by Colonel Batguano (Purity of essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel Batguano
A proposal to build a double set of steel walls with floodlights, surveillance cameras and motion detectors along one-third of the U.S.-Mexican border heads to the Senate next month after winning overwhelming support in the House.

The wall would be intended to prevent illegal immigrants and potential terrorists from hiking across the southern border into the United States. It would run along five segments of the 1,952-mile border that now experience the most illegal crossings.

The plan already has roiled diplomatic relations with Mexico. Leaders in American border communities are saying it will damage local economies and the environment. And immigration experts say that -- at a cost of at least $2.2 billion -- the 700-mile wall would be an expensive boondoggle.

You can do the math from this website...
link $2.2billion for 700 mile fence our whole border with Mexico is 1,952-miles

527 posted on 04/11/2006 7:53:13 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson