People wanted change because they were unsatified and the democrats in congress lost because of it.
Perot set a course for change, many people followed it.
Republicans nationalizing the elections means what?
They ran for congress on national issues.
Let's be honest that makes no common sense at all, we elect congressmen to deal with National issues.
This brilliant republican strategery of running on national issues is not a strategy at all, it's what they should have been doing anyway.
Anything else is political suicide.
What makes no sense is your posts saying Perot encouraged more Republican victories in the Congress. Perot had NOTHING to do with that whatsoever, no matter how hard you try to revise history.
What is abundantly clear is that Perot was a "spoiler" that helped Clinton to two terms in the White House. That's all that needs to be said.