Skip to comments.
Immigration "Solutions" (Thomas Sowell Slams Open Borders Lobby's Insult Of American People Alert)
Townhall.com ^
| 06/11/06
| Thomas Sowell
Posted on 04/10/2006 11:30:29 PM PDT by goldstategop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
The Open Borders Lobby insults the American people by behaving as though the movement of illegal aliens across borders is like the weather - a force of nature beyond anyone's control. And as Thomas Sowell is quick to warn us, the most likely answer to that problem is the elites will ratify the helplessness of the phenomena we are witnessing by giving to us the familiar so-called solution called amnesty under some other name.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
To: goldstategop
" What is likely to be done? A pretense of reducing illegal immigration and a reality of amnesty under some other name." If the Senate immigration reform debates were any indicator, this unfortunate assessment is spot on.
2
posted on
04/10/2006 11:37:06 PM PDT
by
moehoward
To: goldstategop
HA!...Down with Sowell...he wants a democrat in office...ok...i didn't put much thought into that....sorry ;)
3
posted on
04/10/2006 11:38:11 PM PDT
by
teldon30
(Far right, elitist, sexist, cynical religious bigot and looter)
To: goldstategop
Ranting and venting may make the Hysterics feel better, they are not solutions. Calling everyone who doesn't want to cluster bomb the Illegals the "Open Border" lobby is a pretty good way to politically isolate yourself to the political fringes. This debate is getting so polarized by those who simply scream down anyone who does not march in lockstep with their emotional whimsy NOTHING will be done.
If that happens THEY win. And then in 5 years we will not be arguing about 11-16 million but instead about 20-30 million with millions of anchor babies approaching voting age.. Solutions, not rabid slogans is what is needed. So far we are getting a lot of name calling and no solutions here. Screaming for 100%er solutions will get you all 100% of NOTHING.
4
posted on
04/11/2006 12:01:27 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(In the end it does not matter if you win. All men die. What matters is how you lived. No surrender)
To: moehoward
Email of Ken Mehlman:
Chairman of GOP:
Chairman@gop.com
Communications: Press, Media, TV and Radio
RNCCOMMUNICATIONS@gop.com
Give them something to talk about at next GOP meetings. Let them know how you feel.
5
posted on
04/11/2006 12:01:35 AM PDT
by
ducks1944
(GOD Bless the USA .)
To: goldstategop
Spanish is an official (note:
official) language in the following countries:
11. Argentina 12. Bolivia 13. Chile 14. Colombia 15. Costa Rica 16. Cuba 17. Dominican Republic 18. Ecuador 19. El Salvador 10. Equatorial Guinea |
|
 |
11. Guatemala 12. Honduras 13. Mexico 14. Nicaragua 15. Panama 16. Paraguay 17. Peru 18. Spain 19. Uruguay 20. Venezuela |
(Source: http://worldatlas.com/spanish.htm)
This list is actually quite sobering to behold when one thinks of the political and socio-economic conditions in the countries on it.
I'm sure these countries are full of very fine folks and I wish those folks only the best, but it's a fact that the United States is ill-served by anyone who would attempt to make it over in the likeness of any of these Spanish-speaking countries.
To: MNJohnnie
Solutions? Try withdrawing anchor baby status from illegals to keep them from getting U.S citizenship; make employers who employ illegal aliens pay for the full cost of their charges demands upon our public services. Charge illegal aliens more than American citizens for public services. Give priority in government and private sector jobs to American citizens. Ensure Americans have the first call on our country's resources. Build a wall along the border and send troops to patrol the entire length of it. Bill the illegals' home countries for the costs of arresting, detaining and deporting their citizens. Speed up removal of criminal aliens from this country. They are all solutions that will help us get our country back. Its not that we don't have the means to effect them; we just don't have the will to do so. I've listed a lot of solutions and haven't called any one names yet. But the other side does plenty of it.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
7
posted on
04/11/2006 12:08:55 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: MNJohnnie
in 5 years we will not be arguing about 11-16 million but instead about 20-30 million I've got news for you pal, there's gonna be 30 million regardless of what you, I or anyone else does.
It's quite clear that two principles that have defined the US for over 200 years are coming to an end: (1) a unified culture, and (2) defined, arbitrary borders.
Now, rather than get exercised about the passing of an era, we should exhibit one of the core attributes that really makes the US great: flexibility - the ability to adapt to changing conditions.
There's no reason why the number of states or the shape of the lower 48 should be carved in stone; after all, the US has fought wars and expanded continuously over it's 225+ years.
Rather than wait for other country's to set our fate, we should seize the initiative and re-define what America is going to look like through the rest of the 21st century.
In other words, we should get serious about what it's going to involve absorbing Mexico. We could let their 31 states operate under some sort of loose confederation governed out of a regional capital in Mexico City, but the end result is that we need to bring Mexico under our rule of law.
With a a little application of free-market rule of law, including, but not limited to anti-trust provisions, land reform, mortgage financing, etc. we'd have 100m US citizens headed sur.
Admittedly, it might sound a little outlandish right now, but it's much more preferable to just sitting here and taking it in the rear.
8
posted on
04/11/2006 12:21:37 AM PDT
by
lemura
To: lemura
H-h-h-h-m-m-m-m-m....just because they want to immigrate to our Country in droves doesn't mean they want us to take over theirs.
9
posted on
04/11/2006 12:33:40 AM PDT
by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: MNJohnnie
We all know that you ARE one of the open border crowd. You advocate letting these ILLEGAL ALIENS have a free ride in all of your posts.
The only real solution is to enforce our existing laws. If this means spending more money so be it, in the long run we will be ahead. Send them back, control the borders, let the LEGAL immigrants in and keep the ILLEGALS out!
If you can't see the danger of this bunch of parasites then I feel sorry for you.
I believe you to be either an ILLEGAL, the relative of ILLEGALS, a business owner who hires ILLEGALS or just an idiot who doesn't know any better.
10
posted on
04/11/2006 12:38:59 AM PDT
by
calex59
(No country can survive multiculturalism. Dual cultures don't mix, history has taught us that!)
To: goldstategop
What insane moron dreamed up anchor baby status. That person if still alive and all who supported/ voted for that bill ought to be hanged at the very least. The logic for such a program is just mind boggling. I think the men who lobbied for it must look like pretzels for the contortions they had to submit to, in order to pass such nonsense. How many Republicans signed on?
11
posted on
04/11/2006 12:44:07 AM PDT
by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: MNJohnnie
The solution is simple, but the Feds and the Sheep don't have the stomach for it.
Cut off what they come for: jobs and welfare.
12
posted on
04/11/2006 12:47:56 AM PDT
by
Marine Inspector
(Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
To: wita
It's the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The intention was to confer citizenship on the freed slaves. It is being abused by the illegal immigrants. The co-author had this to say about his amendment:
"Every Person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."
Senator Jacob Howard, Co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, 1866.
It is a sad thing that the language of the amendment didn't make that sentiment crystal clear.
13
posted on
04/11/2006 1:01:43 AM PDT
by
Rastus
To: goldstategop
I watched part of Lou Dobbs today and he had a Mexican man on his program. He's the President of the "Mexican American Political Action" group. His last name is Lopez but I don't remember his first name. What I remember most was his anger and his animosity toward Lou Dobbs and ANYONE who doesn't want to give amnesty. He was rude and hateful, and he called Lou a racist. THAT really made Lou mad.
Lou asked him what they want, and he said "the same rights as all Americans have." IF they become citizens, then they will DEMAND the same pay that ALL AMERICANS get, and there will be NO MORE CHEAP LABOR for the big corporations that run Congress. That means they will have to bring a whole new batch of illegals to work the farms, etc.
What the OBL doesn't understand is that this organization has millions of voters and they intend to put Mexicans into office in America. IF they ever give them amnesty, it will change the face of America. Literally!! What I don't understand about these idiots who wave the Mexican flag is IF they think Mexico is so darn great, why aren't they there? They want to bring Mexican style of corruption to our government and I say NO. Not just NO, but HELL NO!! IF I wanted to live in Mexico, I'd move to Mexico!!!
14
posted on
04/11/2006 1:35:15 AM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(NO GUEST WORKER PLAN! IT IS REALLY AMNESTY, SHAMNESTY OR SCAMNESTY - IT IS THE SELL OUT OF AMERICA)
To: goldstategop
"I've listed a lot of solutions and haven't called any one names yet. But the other side does plenty of it."
Psssst--you're posting to the other side.
15
posted on
04/11/2006 1:39:34 AM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: goldstategop
Draft them and send them off to Iraq!
To: Rastus
"...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..."
The Supreme Court's SCOTUS voided the "property" part. Now the illegals think they have a right to rewrite the rest of it.
To: MNJohnnie
Maybe you're not old enough to remember the promises of the 1986 fix. Many of us are. Virtual fenses and suggestions of amnesty promise us a near explosion of foreign nationals in our midst within a decade. Those of us who witnessed the 1986 fiasco, want no part of a repeat.
What your comments intimate is that you want to see the Senate version pass. That's no real fix. It's a surrender. It won't achieve anything but exactly what I've described above.
Those who have seen this play out before, don't want to see it again. What you see as fringe, is folks who understand what the stakes are and are not afraid to speak out openly. Sorry you didn't realize that.
18
posted on
04/11/2006 2:26:37 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
To: goldstategop
"What is likely to be done? A pretense of reducing illegal immigration and a reality of amnesty under some other name." Where would America be without our Senate?
19
posted on
04/11/2006 2:34:49 AM PDT
by
manwiththehands
("Rule of law"? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want amnesty, muchacho!)
To: NRA2BFree
The Feds will never let the Southwest leave the United States. Even if Mexicans held every political office in the Southwest. There is simply too much invested in the region. Additionally, Mexico wont be able to fight for it. In 2005, Mexico spent 8 Billion on its Military. In 2005, the US spent 518 billion on its Military. In a head to head military conflict, Mexico would fall in a few days. I tend to agree with Rush on this situation. These illegal immigrants are simply being used by the Democratic party. It is the only way they stand a chance of winning back seats in the House or Senate.
IMHO - We need a wall and enforced border ASAP. Figuring out which illegals get sent back is a separate issue from enforcing the border. We also need a President/Senate and Congress that wont play politics with the situation. If a civil conflict begins in this region, our current politicians will have blood on their hands.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson