Just cause they didn't find any DNA doesn't mean it still didn't happen.
Still, there's sweat, spit, dandruff, skin flecks, etc. And the defense attorneys are reporting none of that stuff was found either.
Still, we have ONLY the defense attorneys. Our other crime thread from the other weekend, about the HSD guy who was cruising for 14 year old girls on the net, had a cop in Florida reporting the guy had made a full confession and was cooperating fully. Then, the story came out late last week that the cop was now saying the perp confessed to all sorts of stuff as long as the tape recorder was OFF, but when they turned it on, he said something different, which doesn't sound like "cooperation" at all.
It doesn't look good for the complainant here (since she's known to be into dope, alcohol, drunk driving, and making babies with whoever and whenever), but I'm going to wait to see what the DA has to say about the DNA reports. Maybe he has a third interpretation of all this that will change the direction the story is taking.
Wanna explain how rape can happen and there be no DNA?
How could it still have happened if there was no medical signs of intercourse and no DNA found at all?
Sorry, but that is an impossibility....
Riiiiiiight, except that the DR. said there was no sex. She's a lying whore who caused irreparable damage to these boys.