Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China: Liberty Rising?
Front Page Magazine ^ | 4/10/2006 | Jamie Glazov

Posted on 04/10/2006 11:06:54 AM PDT by Paul Ross

China: Liberty Rising?
By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | April 10, 2006


Frontpage Interview's guest today is Harry Wu, who spent nineteen years in Chinese prison camps during the 1960s and 1970s. He was arrested and detained again for sixty-six days in 1995 at the Chinese border while on a fact-finding mission. He is executive director of the Laogai Research Foundation in Washington, D.C., and has held research positions at the University of California at Berkeley and Stanford University. He has built a database of information on more than eleven hundred prisons and concentration camps in the Chinese gulag system, or "Laogai," which literally means "reform through labor." He is the author of two autobiographical books, and has received several nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Preview Image

FP: Mr. Wu it is an honor and privilege to have you here.

Wu: I am glad to have this opportunity to say a few words about Communist China and the Laogai.

FP: Are there any Chinese citizens who actually believe in communism and support the Communist Party?

Wu: Both China’s Communist Party (CCP) and the common Chinese clearly understand that the Communist Revolution has failed. Today it maintains a traditional totalitarian regime with a capitalism style under the name of Communism. Today almost no one trusts the CCP, and no one believes that communism is their future, including members of the Party.

FP: Tell us your thoughts on the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. What is your interpretation in retrospect?

 

Wu: The Tiananmen Movement was a great democracy movement. Since the CCP came to power in 1949, almost every major campaign had been launched by the CCP, but this movement was entirely out of the CCP’s control. However, if compared with the “1968 Prague Spring”, this mass movement in China was immature, both politically and in terms of theory. There were some significant and historical indications to support the importance of this movement - for example, the individual who stopped the military tank, the military troops knocking down the Goddess of Liberty, and the people who damaged Mao’s portrait at the Tiananmen Gate.

 

FP: How does the Communist system keep surviving with a capitalist system? Will something have to give way soon?

 

Wu: My understanding is that the communist system means totalitarianism and no private ownership. Today the CCP has no choice but allow the capitalist system to come back to help them to survive, so the capitalist system is growing in China. But the existence of a capitalist system doesn’t necessarily mean freedom and democracy. It is possible that China could still maintain a totalitarian regime with a dictatorship for many years, just as China has had for the past couple thousand years.

 

FP: Do you think the Chinese people yearn for freedom or for a stern authoritarian father figure? I ask this in the sense that I am Russian and, as the son of Soviet dissidents, I always thought that all people want freedom. But the more I examine my own people, I am not so sure a large percentage of them want anything to do with individual freedom and responsibility. Look at all the statues of Stalin being resurrected. Look at Putin’s re-Brezhnevization. Perhaps most Russians, with their long history of slavery, just want to be led. I am not necessarily saying this is true; I am just asking a question. What do you think?

 

Wu: There is no doubt that freedom and human rights are a natural part of every human. However, it is true that liberty, human rights and democracy are not a part of Chinese history, culture and tradition. Chinese philosophy always talks about status, order, class and ethics.

 

FP: What is the atmosphere in China today?

 

Wu: The people have paid a high cost to learn that communism is a joke. People are seeking freedom and human rights today.

 

China today is a nation standing at the crossroads of history. It is a nation that, as its people collectively ponder which way to go, will become the most important international issue the rest of the world will have to deal with in this new century.

 

FP: China will eventually have to face the Islamist threat, no? How will it deal with it?

 

Wu: Islamists generally do not pose a serious threat to China. Muslims mostly live in the remote, northwestern area of China, not in the central part of the country. If an uprising or rebellion were to occur in this region, the Chinese government would suppress it, just as the Qing government did in the 18th century with a bloody suppression that included the killing of 30 million Muslims. 

 

FP: Is the U.S. pursuing the right policy toward China?

 

Wu: The U.S. policy toward China is dominated by interests of cooperation. This short-sighted policy is actually rebuilding another communist superpower. The money and technology from the West may benefit the average Chinese person, but it also largely serves as a blood transfer to a dying communist regime. Why don’t we tell the Beijing government that there will be “No Free Lunch?”

 

I wish people were more aware today that while China is moving toward capitalism, it is state-controlled, and not free capitalism. And that capitalism
does not necessarily entail freedom and democracy.

 

I would prefer to see a free, democratic and prosperous China rather than a powerful and prosperous but totalitarian China. 

 

FP: You have compared the Chinese communists to Nazis. Can you talk about this a bit?

 

Wu: Both of them are totalitarian regimes. Both of them lack the freedoms of speech, religion and association. The Nazi system was based on private ownership, but the regime controlled the economy. The communist system in China is partially giving up state ownership, but it entirely controls the economy. In Nazi Germany, Hitler divided people by race and set up Holocaust concentration camps to abolish humans. According to communist class ideology, the CCP divided people by economic status and set up Laogai camps to get rid of people. Genocide is equal to Classicide.

 

FP: Give us a few sentences on Mao and Deng Xiaping.

 

Wu: Both were the worst kind of tyrants in history. Deng was involved in every crime of Mao. Deng did his best to preserve Mao’s evil system, continuingly placing Chinese under Communist rule.

 

FP: Why is there tyranny in the world?

 

Wu: People are selfish, and they want to have a good life. Some clever people, assisted by philosophers, create an ideal (-ism) to try to tell the people that they are able help them have a good life, giving them power and authorization, and they become tyrants after they receive this power. 

 

FP: Why do you think the Western Left so adored Mao, the world's greatest mass murderer?

 

Wu: These Western leftists are very decent people, but unfortunately they act as ideologues when standing with a brutal tyranny in the world.

 

FP: Well, I disagree completely with you about these Western leftists being “decent” people.  I don’t know anything decent about people who reach out in solidarity to mass murderers. People who support death cults do not support them for good reasons; they support them because they know exactly what the death cults are and exactly what they do -- and they enjoy living vicariously through the perpetration of mass death and suicide. But we will have to have a debate over this issue in another time and place my friend.

 

Wu: Not all leftists are the same, the ones are you referring to are different from the ones I am talking about.

 

FP: Well, the leftists who support and venerate mass murderers like Mao do so for the same reason, and they are not decent people. But we'll have to have this out in another forum I guess. 

 

Let us move on to the issue of abortion. The government of China has instituted a policy that has resulted in the murder of one million baby girls every year for the last ten or more years. Will this ever end? What is behind this barbaric crime? Where are the West's feminists? Why are they silent on this crime against women?

 

Wu: Giving birth is a fundamental right of human beings, but it is restricted in China. For every woman, regardless of her marital status, if she doesn’t have a permit from the government, she is not allow to give birth, and each family is only allowed to have one child. The Chinese government’s justification for this national policy is that its population is growing too quickly because of economic development, and China has limited natural resources, so in order for China to become a prosperous nation, it must deprive people of their fundamental rights.

 

Forced abortion and forced sterilization are the primary measures used to implement the national policy. The West cares deeply about the abortion issue, but only with regard to their own society. I don’t believe they are hypocritical or discriminatory, but they do have a double standard.

 

FP: I believe they are just that: hypocritical. Leftist feminists in the West who pretend they care about women focus on the issue of abortion in their own society only as a weapon to wage war on their own society. If they truly cared about women’s rights, they would care about women all over the world, including the little baby female fetuses that are killed precisely because they are female. But leftist feminists in the West couldn’t care less about women, a fact demonstrated by their complete indifference to issues such as this in China and, for that matter, in the Middle East, where honor killings, female genital mutilation and forced marriage prevail under a vicious and sadistic system of gender apartheid -- in the face of the deafening silence of the West’s leftist feminists.

 

But let us move on. Tell us about some of your experiences in the Chinese Gulag. How did you prevail?

 

Wu: By the CCP’s definition the word Laogai means “Reform through Labor.” All of the inmates are forced to labor and forced to undergo brainwashing. No one can refuse the hard labor, and everyone has to uphold communism. No hero may survive the Laogai. The way I survived was by reducing from a human being into a beast. I am a survivor. I am a witness. I am not a hero.

 

FP: When you look at back at your long years in the Chinese Gulag, what meaning do you see in it? Do you have any regrets? Perhaps to have done something differently?

 

Wu: If my fate and my experience in the Chinese Laogai were an individual case, then I could forget about it and never want to talk about it again. Unfortunately, millions of other people shared the same fate. Why, when the people of the world condemned the Holocaust, did they deny the Gulag and ignore the Laogai?

 

Life is short for every person, and everyone has the same destination, the graveyard, so everyone has to enjoy their life, but they should not lie, they should tell the truth and do something good for others.

 

FP: Will China one day be free?

 

Wu: Free from Communist tyranny? Yes, and it will be soon. But as for China turning into a free and democratic country, there is still a long way to go.

 

FP: Mr. Wu thank you kindly for joining us today. It was a true honor to have you here. Any final thoughts?

 

Wu: When I heard Martin Luther King say “I Have a Dream” in 1963, I was in a Laogai prison camp. I was told that I had no value, I was nothing, and that even if I were to die, that would only pollute a piece of land.

 

Everyone has the right to have a dream. But for many years I could not. Not only did the authorities not allow me to have my own dream, I also didn’t want to have a dream. Dreams are nice, dreams are wonderful, and dreams create energy, but dreams also sometimes cause serious problems. Should I have a dream of freedom? Should I have a dream of love? I did have these dreams. Dreams also cause suffering and pain. Because I supposed that I could never become a free man. Under oppression, dreams are torturous. 

 

But since I have become a free man, I can dream now. My son, he's my dream. I hope that my son, and all Chinese boys and girls, will never lose their freedom, will never lose their faith like me.

 

I want to have a dream like Martin Luther King did: “Freedom belongs to everyone.”

 

FP: You say you are not a hero sir, but you are a true hero to all of us here at Frontpage. Thank you Mr. Wu for joining us. Thank you for your courageous and noble fight for freedom. It was a true honor to speak with you sir.

 

Wu: Thank you Jamie.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; communism; freetrade; harrywu; totalitarianism

1 posted on 04/10/2006 11:06:58 AM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Harry Wu should be the next US ambassador to China. :)


2 posted on 04/10/2006 11:38:04 AM PDT by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Great article. Thanks for posting.


3 posted on 04/10/2006 11:39:04 AM PDT by olderwiser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

bump for later..........


4 posted on 04/10/2006 11:43:25 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Wu: The U.S. policy toward China is dominated by interests of cooperation. This short-sighted policy is actually rebuilding another communist superpower. The money and technology from the West may benefit the average Chinese person, but it also largely serves as a blood transfer to a dying communist regime. Why don’t we tell the Beijing government that there will be “No Free Lunch?”

Worth repeating.

5 posted on 04/10/2006 11:51:14 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Neither capitalism nor communism are proper terms to describe the political/economic ideology in China. The appropriate term is "fascism". It's the power of a totalitarian state with the powerful engine of aspects of capitalism. Makes it pretty scary.


6 posted on 04/10/2006 12:01:42 PM PDT by PFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PFC; backhoe; kattracks; tallhappy; Jeff Head; doug from upland; Alamo-Girl; maui_hawaii; ...
The appropriate term is "fascism".

True enough.

7 posted on 04/10/2006 12:04:36 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

Marker to reference for later reading....


8 posted on 04/10/2006 12:35:09 PM PDT by Yossarian ("If you're going through hell, KEEP GOING!" -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
OK, I read it now - this is a great interview - very insightful, very profound. I especially love what he has to say about dreams.

It's time to stop cowtowing to these Chinese Fascist scumbags just because they have a huge source of cheap labor! Look at where things are made before you buy!

9 posted on 04/10/2006 1:07:17 PM PDT by Yossarian ("If you're going through hell, KEEP GOING!" -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
"Wu: The U.S. policy toward China is dominated by interests of cooperation. This short-sighted policy is actually rebuilding another communist superpower. The money and technology from the West may benefit the average Chinese person, but it also largely serves as a blood transfer to a dying communist regime. Why don’t we tell the Beijing government that there will be “No Free Lunch?”"

So the answer to the title is "no." We're helping to transform a communist nation into a fascist empire. And more than 150,000 businesses in China are owned by the government. But yes, the trade will continue to make a few people in the USA richer for a short while.
10 posted on 04/10/2006 4:19:21 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Deng was involved in every crime of Mao. Deng did his best to preserve Mao’s evil system, continuingly placing Chinese under Communist rule.

But Heinz Kissinger said he was "one of the great reformers in Chinese history."

11 posted on 04/10/2006 4:52:06 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Wu: By the CCP?s definition the word Laogai means ?Reform through Labor.?

Didn't the Nazis post 'Arbeit Macht Frei' above the entrances to gas chambers? Didn't that mean something like 'Work Set You Free' ??

Maybe the CCP are modern Nazis, just like Wu says.

12 posted on 04/10/2006 5:41:05 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Wu: The U.S. policy toward China is dominated by interests of cooperation. This short-sighted policy is actually rebuilding another communist superpower. The money and technology from the West may benefit the average Chinese person, but it also largely serves as a blood transfer to a dying communist regime. Why don’t we tell the Beijing government that there will be “No Free Lunch?”

I agree that we should not treat Red China as a normal trading partner. It's not: it's a vicious totalitarian state. As Mr. Wu says, the wealth that the PRC is gaining from trade with us is keeping the CCP in charge and new weapons amassed.

The corrupting influence of the CCP is causing our greatest companies to collaborate in repressing the Chinese people: Cisco, Microsoft, Google all kowtow to the CCP.

I think that we should cease normal trade relations with China. We didn't treat the Soviet Union this way, building it up into a great global power with vast wealth.

13 posted on 04/10/2006 6:05:47 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

China, methinks, is a bit smarter than Russia was.

They know just who to bribe, and how much.

And I don't suppose for a moment that Bubbaboy Billy Klintoon was the first or only US politician that they ever got to and have securely in their pocket, either.


14 posted on 04/10/2006 6:55:08 PM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Club Freedom; Dues: Vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 04/10/2006 9:31:59 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
You're welcome.

Had someone...likely from the PRC...with broken english trying to dissuade me from the essential truth of the CCP's brutality and totaliarism. He cited a skeptical article from Australia...which nonetheless concluded:

Excerpt from Mike Stetee "The Price is Rights", The Australian.

"It is well established that China conducts so-called organ harvesting, including among the 5000 to 12,000 people sentenced to death each year, and not necessarily with their permission or that of their families. It is a lucrative trade, with overseas patients flying to China for transplants.

What is also clear is that China has a terrible human rights record, including in its repression of Falun Gong. According to the recently released US State Department report on human rights for 2005, the trend in China is towards increased harassment and imprisonment of those perceived as threatening government authority.

It estimates there are tens of thousands of political prisoners and about 300,000 people in "re-education through labour" camps, including thousands of Falun Gong adherents. The report quotes overseas estimates that up to 2000 of its members have died in custody and cites accounts of torture, rape and treatment in psychiatric hospitals.

Why is China so worried about people who practise meditation and exercise programs to improve the body and mind but have no history of violence? In short, religion and fanaticism. Members share beliefs that include elements of Confucianism, Buddhism and the supernatural. The sect's prolific publications run a strongly anti-Communist line and, as the Sujiatun example suggests, it is quite willing to match the Chinese Government when it comes to propaganda.

While many in China have renounced their beliefs under duress, others have refused to do so, even at the cost of torture or death. Beijing regards Falun Gong as a threat precisely because it is beyond its control and China has a history of religious movements overthrowing dynasties.

The admin moderator already banned the guys' account. Did he visit your mailbox too?

16 posted on 04/11/2006 12:01:04 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Ugh. That should have said 'totalitarianism'.

Sigh.

17 posted on 04/11/2006 12:02:12 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Evidently I was spared. LOL!


18 posted on 04/11/2006 1:46:08 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Got to repeat his words of wisdom:

Wu: The U.S. policy toward China is dominated by interests of cooperation. This short-sighted policy is actually rebuilding another communist superpower. The money and technology from the West may benefit the average Chinese person, but it also largely serves as a blood transfer to a dying communist regime. Why don’t we tell the Beijing government that there will be “No Free Lunch?”



I wish people were more aware today that while China is moving toward capitalism, it is state-controlled, and not free capitalism. And that capitalism
does not necessarily entail freedom and democracy.



I would prefer to see a free, democratic and prosperous China rather than a powerful and prosperous but totalitarian China.


19 posted on 04/11/2006 2:03:05 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson