Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk
I don't agree with your historical assessment. In those cases you had articulate speakers - Reagan and Newt - who could communicate with both the right and the middle. It had more to do with effective communications than previous defeat.

I want to make an additional comment as the your above quote makes my point.

Reagan was just as good at public speaking in 1976 as he was in 1980 and he was considered far more electable in 1976 than 1980 because of his age. Even with the things in his favor, he couldn't get past Ford by his was a sitting incumbent.It wasn't until the Democrat-Lite Republican incumbent was out of the way that Reagan got his shot.

That is the whole problem - the Democrat-Lite Repbublican incumbents are mucking up the works - they block anyone better from getting past them.

If a man like Reagan couldn't even beat Ford in 1976 then that shows you the power that sitting incumbents have in the primary process.

708 posted on 04/11/2006 7:49:41 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta

Intentionally giving up and hoping to come back to win the day in the future is a strategy for crackpots and losers.


711 posted on 04/11/2006 8:26:31 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson