Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger
"Virtually none of which having the accomplishments he has achieved. He is an effective communicator, and a competent analyst, all in the context of someone who has "been there, and done that.""

You know what all the military folks on this site have done during their careers? And take a look a Travis' recent posting history. You call THAT effective communication. Try S-P-A-M. And he refused to debate anyone who disagreed with him. He simply resorted to calling them names.

"If his history does not excuse his recent performance"

He was asked specifically by the owner of this site to knock off his antics. He was even given a temporary time out as a less than subtle hint. He ignored it all. I don't care what kind of saint a person has been...when he proves he can no longer follow the rules, he gets to pay the price.

"Wrong. Above all is "the objective." The rest is a dog and pony show. If one officer can not achieve the objective under the rules of engagement, he will be replaced by one that can circumvent those rules more effectively."

And with that, you PROVE you have no familiarity with military operations. None. Military officers are not rewarded for circumventing rules of engagement. They are fired. Or thrown in jail depending on what rules they violated. What in your mind could possibly lead you to believe you are qualified to lecture on matters of military operations?

"Your concluding statement strongly indicates questionable understanding."

Congratulations. You've posted one of the least coherent statements I've read on FreeRepublic in recent memory. But don't worry, you quickly outdid yourself with this one..."The point of which was if you want a job done, but can't do it for yourself, leave the man that can do it to do it." Of course, since you were obviously on a roll, your next two sentences make even less sense. But I'm not going to repost them because I'm afraid whatever ailment you have might be catching. Honestly, I think reading the last portion of your post actually drained some of my intelligence.

548 posted on 04/12/2006 11:08:56 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]


To: Rokke

Since you seem to be the only one to really object to TG's so called spam, me thinketh you complaineth too much to be an innocent bystander poster.

As far as name calling goes I get it from the elite RNC operative freepers all the time. I'm getting to kind of like it, it reminds me of how nasty the Republican party has become to it's majority of voters.


549 posted on 04/12/2006 11:21:20 PM PDT by tertiary01 (May 1st-- PINKO DE MAYO shop til you drop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

To: Rokke
My word!

Your obviously practiced ease with truly mendacious "special pleading" is only slightly more disturbing than your myopic pontification on what is and is not "military."

Still, I suppose your "perfumed prince" management theory of leadership does explain how you toady so well.

569 posted on 04/13/2006 4:30:46 AM PDT by papertyger (Our Constitution isn't perfect, but it's better than what we have right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson