Posted on 04/09/2006 10:14:53 PM PDT by Murtyo
The Congress has received lots of free advice lately from Mexican government officials and illegal aliens waving Mexico's flag in mass demonstrations coast-to-coast. Most of it takes the form of bitter complaints about our actual or prospective treatment of immigrants from that country who have gotten into this one illegally or who aspire to do so.
If you think these critics are mad about US immigration policy now, imagine how upset they would be if we adopted an approach far more radical than the bill they rail against which was adopted last year by the House of Representatives namely, the way Mexico treats aliens.
In fact, as a just-published paper by the Center for Security Policy's J. Michael Waller points out, under a constitution first adopted in 1917 and subsequently amended, Mexico deals harshly not only with illegal immigrants. It treats even legal immigrants, naturalized citizens and foreign investors in ways that would, by the standards of those who carp about US immigration policy, have to be called "racist" and "xenophobic."
Mexico's Glass House
For example, according to an official translation published by the Organization of American States, the Mexican constitution includes the following restrictions:
Pursuant to Article 33, "Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country." This ban applies, among other things, to participation in demonstrations and the expression of opinions in public about domestic politics like those much in evidence in Los Angeles, New York and elsewhere in recent days.
Equal employment rights are denied to immigrants, even legal ones. Article 32: "Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable."
Jobs for which Mexican citizenship is considered "indispensable" include, pursuant to Article 32, bans on foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports.
Article 55 denies immigrants the right to become federal lawmakers. A Mexican congressman or senator must be "a Mexican citizen by birth." Article 91 further stipulates that immigrants may never aspire to become cabinet officers as they are required to be Mexican by birth. Article 95 says the same about Supreme Court justices.
In accordance with Article 130, immigrants even legal ones may not become members of the clergy, either.
Foreigners, to say nothing of illegal immigrants, are denied fundamental property rights. For example, Article 27 states, "Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters."
Article 11 guarantees federal protection against "undesirable aliens resident in the country." What is more, private individuals are authorized to make citizen's arrests. Article 16 states, "In cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities." In other words, Mexico grants its citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution. Imagine the Minutemen exercising such a right!
The Mexican constitution states that foreigners not just illegal immigrants may be expelled for any reason and without due process. According to Article 33, "the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action."
The Bottom Line
As the immigration debate in the Senate moves into a decisive phase this week, legislators who believe America's southern border must be secured, the Nation's existing immigration laws enforced and illegal aliens not rewarded with permanent residency and a direct path to citizenship are being sharply criticized and, in some cases, defamed as bigots and xenophobes. Yet, even their maximalist positions generally pale in comparison with the treatment authorized by the Mexican constitution.
So the next time such legislators and the majority of Americans for whom they speak are assaulted by Mexican officials, undocumented aliens waving Mexican flags in mass demonstrations here in the United States, clergy and self-described humanitarians, businessmen and other advocates of illegal immigration ask them this: Would they favor having the US impose the same restrictions on immigrants legal and illegal that Mexico imposes on their counterparts there?
Nothing of the kind is in the cards, of course. Nor should it be. Legal immigration and the opportunity for foreign investors and other nationals legitimately to contribute to this country are not only one of its hallmarks; they are among the reasons for its greatness.
Still, we should not allow the hypocrisy of others' treatment of undocumented aliens in their countries to induce us to refrain from taking effective steps to prevent further illegal immigration: by building a fence along our southern border; by enforcing immigration laws in the workplace and elsewhere; and by discouraging more such violations with potentially grave national security implications by dealing effectively with those who have already broken those laws by coming here without permission.
(This update courtesy of the Center for Security Policy.)
this one is perhaps the most ironic of all "Article 16 states, "In cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities." In other words, Mexico grants its citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution. Imagine the Minutemen exercising such a right!"
mexican double-standard ping
It is interesting. All of these things have old historical roots.
That on preventing foreigners from joining the clergy is left over from the anti-clerical campaigns of the 1920's and the subsequent Catholic revolt. It seems to be a measure to keep out "outside agitators".
Etc. The Mexican constitution, like so many others, is more of a compendium of legistaltion than the US one.
ping...
THANK YOU!!
GDamnD Mexicrap doublestandard.
I've traveled from TX to Belize, and back again, in a Datsun B-210. Scary...Enlightening...Thrilling.
The Mexicraps are CORRUPT, FILTHY, DISGUSTING, EVIL, STINKING FERGIN BASTAGES.
While I agree fully that we need to beef up our borders so we can better control ingress of aliens, I think the only practical way to deal with those already here is to give them special status. There is no way we could or would deport 11 million illegals, so either we leave them in status quo, or we acknowledge their contribution to our society (good and bad) and give them work permits. Remember that before WWII there was no special paperwork required to enter the US. So all emigrants were "undocumented" and we seemed to get along fine with them. We have a vibrant growing economy with a very low unemployment rate, so the undocumented visitors can't be having much of a effect on our economics. Thus, I favor a guest worker program for them.
Actually there is racism here. The US is perceived, wrongly so, as white.
It is only because of this perception that all the bad things about the US illegal immigration policy are being stated by the liberals.
The racism here is largely that of those in this country who receive preferential legal treatment because of their race. They are not white. They are the first class citizens, and they are racists.
I hear you on the Mex. Constitution being more of a "compendium of legislation" than a classic constitution or a constitution in the tradition of the United States. But it's almost funny and definitely the height of Irony that Mexicans are explicitly permitted to arrest foreigners in Mexico illegally.
"Remember that before WWII there was no special paperwork required to enter the US. So all emigrants were "undocumented" "
...and on what do you base this fallacy???
The US is perceived, wrongly so, as white.
........another lie??? On what do you base this statement??? English, Irish, germans were not majority? or are you just talking about american indians? Many american are mixed with American Indians.
What is YOUR definition of WHITE??? Please, let us know your basis for such an assumption and statistics (numbers).
"Remember that before WWII there was no special paperwork required to enter the US. So all emigrants were "undocumented" "
...and on what do you base this fallacy???
ping
Huh? Not the way my grandparents were allowed into this once great country - they came through Ellis Island like everyone did and they needed papers, took health exams and were rejected if carrying disease, and needed a sponsor. "All emigrants were undocumented" - you have to be kidding or really stupid!! Or by emigrants do you mean those leaving the US?
I will read this tomorry. I am lierally falling asleep.
Have you seen THIS? In Spanish on the reverse side and being handed out and posted at the protests. Disgusting.
yes, seen that abortion.
sickening, ain't it?
I have lost the ability to calmly post about the invasion.I am ignoring the threads for the most part. I refuse to get baited. We are losing our country.
The statement that we can't import them is a defeatists statement made by people who have an ax to grind and wan't ILLEGALS to stay here.
Get them the hell out of our country and make sure all legal immigrants assimilate into our society as AMERICANS.
Mexico is a very pitiful country that thinks it can tell the USA just how to run i't business. The thousands of illegals in the USA should scare Americans to death, for we have believed that our country was enforcing immgration laws when they were not.
I just read now that the Irish are complaining about how many of their illegals will have to leave the USA.
People this is NOT just a problem with Mexicans, the whole world has decended upon us. We must get tough if we are to survive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.