Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: going hot
However, consider, if you will, that no wall, even the great one, will deter hordes bent on getting to the other side. Boat loads simply come around. The wall becomes an inconvenience for the truly focused, not an insurmountable obstacle. You can still do the adverb to it.

A wall would work - it's a physical structure that people would have a very hard time getting over and it's not like it wouldn't be patrolled.

It is not clear why so many are trying to act like a wall is akin to thin piece of paper.

To be clear, a wall will never be built. Bush will not allow it.

Unfortunately, the 2 steps that would solve the immigration problem and make the current illegals deport would never be allowed by Bush either - cutting off social services to illegals and cracking down on employers.

74 posted on 04/09/2006 10:16:37 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta

I am not disagreeing with you regards the need for a wall. I am simply stating that, IF one is built, and a substantial one out of necessity, it still must be enforced, with violent consequences, and certain, should someone test the barrier. Otherwise, it may as well be planned and constructed by the people who build senator Byrd's freeways, and just as useless.


79 posted on 04/09/2006 10:20:46 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson