The Global Alarmists have been using 'selective reporting' in an attempt to frighten the public for years, and typically like to START the measurements at the depth of the last ice age, then use faulty models to come up predetermined 'answers'.
Aside from the end result, is this any different?
sorry, my bad mouse clicking. I meant to address my comment to the opening post, somehow it ended up replying to yours.
I do not see it as very different. But two wrongs do not make a right.