To: William Terrell
Well, it's not "theft" - see Plyer v. Doe above - as for "morality", I'm watching "Minority Report" right now. Is that the kind of "morality" you want?
To: clawrence3
When you increase your lot at the expense of others, it is theft, and further compounded by fraud (using forged documents that others take in good faith) and rape/assault (forcing oneself on others without consent).
The court in your little case is dead wrong, for political reasons prevailing in 1982 when it came down, pre-amnesty. The court has been dead wrong and is getting more dead wrong.
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
70 posted on
04/08/2006 9:29:21 PM PDT by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: clawrence3
As you've probably been told, that was a ruling by only another liberal judge who seems to share the opinion of the posted article. That opinion being, the US IS responsible for the entire planet.
AND, I plan to do everything in my power to see that these illegal interlopers are NOT "new American citizens".
71 posted on
04/08/2006 9:30:13 PM PDT by
singfreedom
("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
To: clawrence3
You have a poor grasp of logic. Morality is not determined by judicial fiat.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson