I'm saying that, on the scale going from "socialism" on one end, to "pure free market" on the other, we're too far on the socialism side
Many of the socialistic measures we currently have did not exist in the past, or at least not to the extent we currently have them, and the United States survived without them
For example, in my town, we do not have a government-financed fire dept or ambulance service. This does not mean we don't have firemen or paramedics. We do. They are volunteers, and the services material needs are supported by free donations and fees.
OK, if you think that the modern social system is a mixture of "free market" with "socialism" and the question is what is the right combination, then I agree with you.