No doubt. But not all religious people are pseudo-religious hustlers.
Just like the lastest evolutionary fraud is another example from a long line of evolutionary frauds. But it doesn't mean there aren't some sincere evolutionists that fairly present their observations and conclusions.
Nice try. However, the 'pseudo-religious hustlers' are not held to the same standards as scientists. Try to publish some pseudo-scientific piece of crap in a respectable scientific journal and see what happens. And please let us know.
Show me a major religious denomination that fully backed or endorsed Hovind.
Scientific journals have published a lot of crap through the years. The list of science mavericks that were ridiculed by scientific journals and were refused publishing is actually quite long.