That may have been the second scene shot, but the first was definitely a youngster pondering whether to 'get into the game' with the basketball and I read the word as 'homophobia'. Perhaps I'm mistaken. That's what caught my attention to the ad. Additionally, Bayer has been associated with gay advertising campaigns and listed on GLBF websites as a sponsor to contact whenever a media figure makes a comment construed as being 'anti-gay'.
I am sorry but to me you are very dangerous. After reading your first post, I was extremely concerned over Bayer and just commericals in general. Now I come to find out you spoke nonsense. I can't believe how you can be so insane to get a word confused like that. And then to justify your error you add well they do other gay commercials and such with again no proof. I don't have as much of a problem with them listing their site on the GLBF because I am sure that gays get headaches as well. That is a whole different situation that "selling" gay ideas. I am sorry I am trying not to be too mean about this but you are way to dangerous for FR.
I find your criterion for insanity to be rather premature.
If I was mistaken, then confusing 'homophobia' for 'hemophilia' when being quickly read would seem to correspond to a misassociation rather than lack of sanity. On the other hand, if my recollection is correct, then it is less justifiable to ignore the report than a simple misassociation.
Memory, certainty, perception, logic, justification, faith, and belief all have pertinent relationships in the study of knowledge.
I hope this quells your fear of how dangerous you summise my post to have been.