Skip to comments.
Child porn charge against DOD IPv6 director dropped
http://www.defensesystems.com ^
| 4 7 06
| Patience Wait
Posted on 04/08/2006 2:26:30 AM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: traviskicks
2
posted on
04/08/2006 2:30:36 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: freepatriot32
Doyle, the Homeland Defense child porn creep, also had a record of porn at Time Magazine where he had worked for 26 years. Time caught porn on his office computer, suspended him, then reinstated after his fellow Time Magazine workers protested.
Why isn't the LMSM interested in this climate of condoning porn at Time and within the media?
To: freepatriot32; butternut_squash_bisque
4
posted on
04/08/2006 3:14:12 AM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: freepatriot32
The charges may have been dropped because his computer may have simply been infected with a virus/Trojan program that distributed kiddie porn without his knowledge. It is apparently a pretty common problem. I think law enforcement should make every effort to determine this prior to publishing his/her name. That just makes him/her a bigger victim if that's what happened.
5
posted on
04/08/2006 3:32:35 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: Ursus arctos horribilis
MSM also is not interested in reporting that this guy is a registered Democrat. They would rather imply that he is a political appointee Republican
6
posted on
04/08/2006 4:10:14 AM PDT
by
johnandrhonda
(have you hugged your banjo today?)
To: sure_fine
To: DB
That just makes him/her a bigger victim if that's what happened.I can't understand why someone would be running a peer-to-peer file sharing system on their work computer -- especially if they work for the US military. A lot of sensitive military documents have gotten out onto the internet this way -- he should have known better.
8
posted on
04/08/2006 7:31:03 AM PDT
by
68skylark
To: johnandrhonda
I believe you may have him confused with the Homeland Security guy.
9
posted on
04/08/2006 7:35:08 AM PDT
by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(Justice and "The Law" are not always the same thing.)
To: johnandrhonda
MSM also is not interested in reporting that this guy is a registered Democrat. They would rather imply that he is a political appointee Republican. How he votes doesn't matter, to think that it does is just stupid.
To: DB
He should be fired at the minimum for using DoD computers for unauthorized activities. What a jerk.
11
posted on
04/08/2006 7:40:45 AM PDT
by
Doohickey
(Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
To: DB
I think law enforcement should make every effort to determine this prior to publishing his/her name. That just makes him/her a bigger victim if that's what happened. Even if he's innocent of the porn charge, doing what he did on a DOD computer should be a crime.
12
posted on
04/08/2006 7:43:14 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Jeannie Nelson
It should not matter whether he is a Republican or Democrat.
But the media has established a pattern that if a Republican goes bad, they trumpet his party affiliation every time his name is mentioned. If a Democrat goes bad party affiliation is not mentioned.
If you read any news story about these sorts of things, and don't see a party affiliation mentioned, assume the person is a Democrat, and you usually will be right.
13
posted on
04/08/2006 7:55:31 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: Cheburashka
If you read any news story about these sorts of things, and don't see a party affiliation mentioned, assume the person is a Democrat, and you usually will be right. Still, it doesn't matter their party. It's about all that blue state red state stuff, it's all a bunch of crap to be divisive. If you want to do your little happy dancer that the guy is a Democrat, go ahead, and what party is Duke Cunningham?
To: freepatriot32; albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; Americanwolfsbrother; AlexandriaDuke; ...

Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
15
posted on
04/08/2006 9:04:44 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/israel_palestine_conflict.htm)
To: Jeannie Nelson
Well, Jeanie, that isn't what your pals over at Democratic Underground think--they made a very large deal out of it when they thought he was a Republican. And, I see that you've been lurking here for two whole days now, so welcome to FreeRepublic.
16
posted on
04/08/2006 9:37:27 AM PDT
by
johnandrhonda
(have you hugged your banjo today?)
To: HoustonCurmudgeon
I WAS referring to the Homeland Security guy--he is also mentioned in the article...
17
posted on
04/08/2006 9:40:07 AM PDT
by
johnandrhonda
(have you hugged your banjo today?)
To: johnandrhonda
Well, Jeanie, that isn't what your pals over at Democratic Underground think--they made a very large deal out of it when they thought he was a Republican. And, I see that you've been lurking here for two whole days now, so welcome to FreeRepublic. I have lurked for a while but never posted because I always saw that new posters were treated rudely. You proved my point.
18
posted on
04/08/2006 9:49:56 AM PDT
by
Jeannie Nelson
(Just because I am new here doesn't make me a democrat. Thanks for the rude welcome.)
To: johnandrhonda
Democratic Underground think--they made a very large deal out of it when they thought he was a Republican. And Free Republic is making a big deal out him being a democrat. So you and Democrat Underground are on the same intellectual level.
19
posted on
04/08/2006 9:52:38 AM PDT
by
Jeannie Nelson
(Just because I am new here doesn't make me a democrat. Thanks for the rude welcome.)
To: Jeannie Nelson
How he votes doesn't matter, to think that it does is just stupid. Bias in reporting does matter. You obviously came here to pick a fight. It took you three whole posts on FR before you called someone stupid. Nice accomplishment.
Intelligent debate usually doesn't include name calling.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson