To: SandRat
To argue for self-representation based on a distrust of Americans is logically inconsistent, since the Judge and Jury are all Americans. If Americans are not trustworthy, what does it matter who the lawyer is?
3 posted on
04/07/2006 7:34:46 PM PDT by
sourcery
(Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
To: sourcery
To argue for self-representation based on a distrust of Americans is logically inconsistent, since the Judge and Jury are all Americans. If Americans are not trustworthy, what does it matter who the lawyer is? Thus, it would make for a far more persuasive argument to contend that lawyers are not trustworthy.
Who would argue otherwise...???
5 posted on
04/07/2006 7:48:08 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson