I see. Whenever a crime is committed by a politician and they don't identify the party, you can dam well bet it's a democrat. I don't think I have ever read or heard them identify a democrat that has committed some kind of dirty deed, but they will always identify a Republican. Always.
Exactly. Just to deviate a little from the thread, in my morning Phoenix paper the headline read "Libby ties Bush to Iraq leaks", and after reading the entire article they leave you with the impression that the DemocRATs have now got Bush where they want him for leaking classified data. They even went back and quoted him out of context about how anyone found to have leaked in his admin would no longer be working in his admin. Never once did the article (William Douglas of Knight Ridder Newspapers) ever once mention that it is perfectly within the law for the President and the Vice President to determine when and if classified data is allowed to be declassified and subsequently be put into the public realm. Reading the article I would conclude now that Libby has squealed like a stuck pig, the impeachment can begin immediately - we have found the source of the leaks - let the games begin!!!. Can't be leaks if GWB and Cheney (Libby) have the authority to declassify parts of the NIE. Libby ties Bush to Iraq leaks