He starts with the result and writes to reach the objective.
And it ooks like he is paid five cents a word, unless the word is "Diverse" or "Diversity", in which case there is a five Dollar bonus for each.
Reading this pithy article was like sprinkling buttery flavored salt on stryofoam, and using it as popcorn. It tasted like it, the texture was close, but somehow left one feeling hungry and empty for content.
He starts with the result and writes to reach the objective.
I didn't sense any political agenda in this particular article. Did I miss it?
Diamond is loved by a few here(not Blam)....they quote him nonstop...like a Messiah.
He epitomizes every thing wrong with the lack of objectivity in science today
I watched something on TV about him a few months ago where he morphed into a crying narcissistic creepy metro.
Eeeew! And then some.
His work will always be suspect for me. He definitely has a an agenda.